When an injured Ellyse Perry found a way

Australia’s captain and coach took a punt on an injured Ellyse Perry in the Women’s World Cup final four years ago. Here’s what happened next

Daniel Brettig26-Jun-2017From behind the stumps, Australia’s captain Jodie Fields could tell things were badly wrong. In attempting to deliver her first over of the 2013 World Cup final in Mumbai, Australia’s outstanding allrounder Ellyse Perry had stopped in her run up not once but twice.Among a leader’s most vital attributes is the ability to give the appearance of calm even when things are going awry. For Fields, the task of maintaining an even strain amid Perry’s ankle problems was difficult in the extreme. “I must admit at the top of the mark there a couple of times my heart sank a bit,” Fields said at the time. “I thought ‘oh no’.”Perry’s selection for the final had been a major gamble due to ankle troubles that required a painkilling injection before the game and would lead to surgery a matter of days after it. Her contribution to the tournament itself had been minimal due to the injury, leaving the teenager Holly Ferling to perform ably as a pace bowler in Perry’s stead.But for the final, Fields and the coach Cathryn Fitzpatrick had chosen to back Perry, and for a few minutes it looked like a failed gambit. West Indies had made a serviceable start in pursuit of Australia’s 259 for 7, with the power of Deandra Dottin and Stafanie Taylor to come. In obvious discomfort after two failed run-throughs, Perry remembers her approach to the wicket feeling decidedly unnatural, in contrast to the smooth rhythm, gather and speedy delivery that had made her such a fearsome prospect for all comers. At the time Perry feared she would be “in for a bit of a long night”, and four years on she admits it was a step into the unknown.”It was a little bit uncomfortable and something I hadn’t felt before with my ankle leading into that match,” Perry says, ahead of Australia’s 2017 World Cup opener, also against West Indies. “But I just needed another shot at it to work out how to bowl.”

What followed the halting start was a passage of play that emphasised not only Perry’s value but also the beauty of pace and spin working in concert

The importance of finding a way to the crease was underlined by what was on the line – this was not only the competition decider but also the final match for Perry’s longtime state and national team-mate Lisa Sthalekar, who had just bowled the previous over. Equally, it was a stern test of the judgement of Fields and Fitzpatrick, four years on from a horrid World Cup campaign on home soil that had forced plenty of behind-the-scenes change to Australia’s coaching setup. Australia’s batting had delivered a strong total, but nothing beyond the reach of Dottin in particular.”In a final, when you put runs on the board, it’s really important to shut down the opposition early in your bowling innings and just not let them get any momentum,” Perry says. “West Indies are probably the most powerful team in world cricket for both men and women, so we were really well aware of their dangers.”After a brief break, Perry tried for a third time, pushing through a contrasting combination of pain and also lack of natural feeling in the joint. It was not the smoothest approach, but she got there, whirring her arm over at pace and getting the ball through to Fields, who followed up by running down to her bowler for an encouraging word or three. With each delivery, Perry’s rhythm improved, then sixth ball she pinned Kycia Knight on the crease to win an lbw verdict. There was as much relief as elation in Australia’s huddle.What followed the halting start was a passage of play that emphasised not only Perry’s value but also the beauty of pace and spin working in concert. Sthalekar wheeled away distinctively, Australian cap firmly in place, and gained expansive turn from the Brabourne Stadium pitch. Meanwhile Perry gathered speed and venom as her ankle warmed up, following up with two more quick wickets to have the figures of 3-2-2-3. Having for a moment looked like chasing Australia’s total without having to deal with Perry at all, West Indies were soon in a world of pain.”In that period we bowled really well in partnerships,” Perry recalls. “Lisa bowled incredibly well at the other end and we just started to put a bit of restriction on West Indies, and I think in a final when you build that kind of pressure it often leads to wickets or mistakes being made by the opposition, so from that point of view I think everyone found their role in the team on that day.Ellyse Perry and Australia gave Lisa Sthalekar the perfect send off•ICC/Getty”I’ve been very fortunate to spend a lot of my career playing with Lisa or her coaching me when I was a junior, so to be on the field when she finished her international career in such fantastic style, from the team’s perspective it was a real pleasure to be able to send her out like that and give her what she deserved after such wonderful service to Australia.”Thanks in no small part to Perry’s persistence, Sthalekar’s night turned into just about the perfect send off: she delivered a pair of classical offbreaks to defeat Dottin and West Indies captain Merissa Aguilleira, and then closed out the match with a stunning snaffle at short midwicket off the bowling of Julie Hunter. Sthalekar was in many ways a forerunner for spin bowling in Australia’s armoury, going from a time when she was commonly the only slow bowler selected to a 2017 when Meg Lanning’s team may select as many as three in the one side – caps on and all.”I noticed that there weren’t a lot of spinners in the women’s game,” Sthalekar says. “Especially in NSW, we didn’t really have any spinners coming through the ranks. I think the next one was Erin Osborne and she made her debut in 2009. For a long period of time I was the sole spinner in NSW. I certainly felt that, knowing spin played a crucial role. But the funny thing is I never really got coached in my bowling either.”Never really had access to any specialist coaches, maybe David Freedman every now and then at a NSW Breakers training session, but nothing next to what the girls get now. It was almost like the coaches involved were predominantly batting or fast-bowling coaches – spinners were left to their own devices.”I’m glad to see a lot of them are bowling with their caps on as well, that’s what I’m really proud of!”Perry’s effort, meanwhile, was described by Jarrod Kimber in these terms: “Perry bowled her entire 10 overs, often limping in between balls or overs, but she just kept going until Australia had won the World Cup. In her last over, Perry bowled a bouncer. It was a special effort, courageous and skillful… what Perry did deserved to be added to illustrious list of Australian cricket propaganda. It’ll start as a gutsy effort that won a game Australia should have always won. Yet, in a few years time, as people forget the details and just remember the result, it’ll be known as the World Cup Ellyse Perry won on one leg.”After surgery, Perry was able to return to Australia’s line-up in time for the Ashes later that year. Four years on, she is back at the World Cup, ready to have another tilt at the trophy. “Any success we’ve had in World Cups sits really high in my memories, and all of us as a team really hold on to those memories because they’re really special, some of the proudest moments of your career,” Perry says. “The ankle injury didn’t really change that experience.”

Confident Root shows early shoots of a bountiful reign

These are early days in the reign of Root, but the signs are already promising. George Dobell runs the rule over his first three days in charge

George Dobell at Lord's08-Jul-2017Selection

This was very much Joe Root’s squad. While it is understood others on the selection panel had differing views in some areas, Root had the confidence to argue for the team he wanted and, after discussion, was backed by the other selectors. Both factors bode well. The decision to play two spinners at Lord’s – the first time England had done so at the ground since 1993 – was a surprise. But with the pair of them combining to claim six wickets in South Africa’s first innings – only the second time this century England’s spinners had taken six wickets in the first innings of a home Test – it was a move that was largely vindicated. The selection of Gary Ballance – especially at No. 3 – remains a little contentious, but he looked secure enough on the third evening and has allowed Root to slip back down to his preferred No. 4 position.Personal performance

By making a century in his first innings as England captain – not just a century, but the highest score by an England captain in their first innings in the role – Root snuffed out any immediate doubts there may have been about the burden of leadership compromising his run-scoring ability. He had some luck early in the innings – he was dropped on 16 – but he also exhibited a nice mixture of patience and positivity to help his side recover from a potentially precarious position to build an imposing one. In doing so, he not only led by example in terms of results, but in terms of showing how he wants his team to play.Review use

Root has so far utilised the DRS twice in the field. While the first appeal – Mark Wood’s lbw shout against Theunis de Bruyn – was declined, it was only done so on an umpire’s call basis. So while England lost one of their reviews, they will not do so in similar circumstances when the new playing regulations are introduced later in the year. The second review – the lbw shout against Keshav Maharaj – turned out to be excellently judged. While Maharaj was well down the pitch and had lunged with a mixture of bat and pad, Root reasoned – and it did appear to be Root who was insistent about using the review – that the ball had struck the pad first and that reviews would prove the ball was going on straight on to hit the stumps. He proved less prophetic when suggesting Ballance review his first-innings dismissal but, in the field at least, he proved astute and decisive.Tactics

Root has started impressively here. Despite very little captaincy experience, he has looked both calm and dynamic. Jimmy Anderson praised his use of the bowlers in South Africa’s first innings, crediting him with using them in short spells to ensure they remained fresh despite the warm weather. He also praised him for the slightly unusual fielding positions – short mid-on and mid-offs, for example – that eventually resulted in the wicket of Quinton de Kock. Recognising the slowing pace of the pitch, Root placed a man just in front of squad on the off side and he eventually took the catch that ended a dangerous innings.Joe Root rings the changes on his first day in the field as Test captain•Getty Images”That was very good field placing,” Anderson said. “And it was all Joe’s idea.” There were some other notable moments: bowling Liam Dawson after lunch on day three was a surprise, but he quickly justified it with the wicket of Maharaj, while the decision to take a bit of pressure off Moeen Ali – both as batsman and bowler – and encourage him to be aggressive appears to have worked well. But Root’s willingness not to contrive funkiness was also welcome: England’s batting on the third evening – when they scored 119 in 51 overs – was fashion-defyingly obdurate. It was justified, though, as it all but batted South Africa out of the game and was made in the face of some good, sustained bowling. Imaginative when required and persistent when necessary, this has been a remarkably assured start from an unexperienced captain.Demeanour

Root has seemed impressively unaltered by the responsibilities of captaincy. Despite suffering from a cold, he has remained open and friendly in his media appearances – an important factor for a sport that probably needs to reengage with a section of society that may have been wearied by more cynical England teams – and both relaxed yet focused on the pitch. So while he was able to laugh off the four over-throws conceded by Stuart Broad on the second day, he tinkered with his field regularly to reflect the changing patterns of the game and didn’t seem to rely too heavily on any of his senior players for advice or support. He looked, in short, as if he had every confidence in his ability and as if he belonged in the role.Luck

Richie Benaud famously said that captaincy was “90 percent luck and 10 percent skill” and the early signs – the very early signs – are that Root might just have that little bit of fortune he will require. Certainly he is fortunate to have a side with such all-round depth – you could argue that the success of both Mike Brearley and Michael Vaughan was predicated on the presence of top-quality allrounders within their side – and such experienced campaigners as Anderson, Broad and Alastair Cook. Here he also benefited from winning an important toss and a couple of missed chances early in his innings. As Benaud also said, though, “but don’t try it without that 10 percent” of skill. Those early signs – those very early signs – suggest Root may have both.

Wobblyline, shoddyline, bulge-gate: Twitter reacts to Moeen's close stumping

Moeen Ali was stumped by the finest of margins at the Gabba, and not everyone agreed with the third umpire’s decision

ESPNcricinfo staff26-Nov-2017

Not all seemed right with the line, on closer inspection.

Duly enough, deliverance seemed to arrive, albeit a few minutes late for Moeen.

New names started doing the rounds.

One more was added to the gate-suffixed nomenclature.

As with all such debates, there was a point of view from the other side too. Was there any benefit of doubt to be given at all?

At the end of the day’s play, Moeen himself wasn’t too fussed about the decision.

Rohit Sharma equals Colin Munro, and MS Dhoni's day of plenty

Hardik Pandya, meanwhile, became the first Indian player to score 30 and take four wickets in a T20I match

Bharath Seervi08-Jul-2018India have registered their sixth successive T20I series win with their 2-1 victory over England. The streak began last year with a 2-1 win over New Zealand, since when they have beaten Sri Lanka and South Africa, won the tri-nation Nidahas Trophy, and beaten Ireland and England on this tour. This was also their ninth successive three-match bilateral T20I series without a defeat. Since 2016, they have won eight series and one was drawn.

India in three-match T20I series since 2016
Opposition Margin Result Home/Away Year
Australia 3-0 Won Away 2016
Sri Lanka 2-1 Won Home 2016
Zimbabwe 2-1 Won Away 2016
England 2-1 Won Home 2017
Australia 1-1* Draw Home 2017
New Zealand 2-1 Won Home 2017
Sri Lanka 3-0 Won Home 2017
South Africa 2-1 Won Away 2018
England 2-1 Won Away 2018

*third game of the series was washed out due to rainRohit Sharma’s third ton
Rohit Sharma became only the second player to score three T20I hundreds. Colin Munro was the first to do so, getting there last year. Rohit scored his maiden T20I century against South Africa at Dharamsala in 2015 and his second against Sri Lanka in Indore last year. Rohit’s 100* off 56 balls was his fifth century in all T20s, which is the most among Indian players and Asian players.Hardik Pandya’s all-round show
Hardik Pandya picked up his maiden four-wicket haul in T20s in the first innings and then scored an unbeaten 33 off 14 balls to finish off India’s chase. He became the first India player and eighth overall to score 30 and take four wickets in a T20I match. The last such all-round performance by any player was in 2015, when Dwayne Bravo scored 31 and picked up 4 for 28 against Sri Lanka.ESPNcricinfo LtdMS Dhoni’s unique record
Dhoni became the first ever player to take five catches in a T20I innings. He was involved in six of the nine dismissals in England’s innings including a run-out. Mohammad Shahzad is the only other player to effect five dismissals in a T20I. He took three catches and effected two stumpings against Oman in 2015.

Peter Siddle eager to fill Australia's leadership gap

Apart from the form he brings from the County Championship, the fast bowler also adds vast experience of Asian conditions to a squad lacking Steven Smith, David Warner, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins

Daniel Brettig25-Sep-20180:54

Australia focussed on Pakistan’s spinners – Siddle

There are a few reasons why Peter Siddle is in Dubai sweating it out with the Australian Test squad, rather than donning a beanie in the last throes of the English County Championship, or firing down a white ball for Victoria in the domestic limited-overs tournament back home. One is his recent performance for Essex, a reminder of Siddle’s quality, and another is his vast experience in Asian conditions, dating back to the 2008 tour of India alongside the likes of Ricky Ponting and Matthew Hayden.Most overwhelming in the factors for Siddle’s recall, however, is that the team now captained by Tim Paine and coached by Justin Langer was desperate for senior figures. Not only to replace the missing Steven Smith, David Warner, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins, but also to help chart a new and better cultural and performance path for the Australian team in their first series since the Newlands ball-tampering scandal.In recent years it could be argued that Siddle’s skills were rather undervalued by Australia, whether it was in his omission from the 2015 Ashes until the final Test, or his being rushed back from injury into the team in late 2016, whereupon he re-injured his back. Now, in the team’s hour of need, Siddle is back in favour, and he has a clear idea of why this is so.”JL’s spoken a lot about good people and good characters and coming into the side I think, just from an outside point of view, the side probably in the last little bit maybe lacked a bit of leadership,” Siddle said in Dubai. “So I think without having the captain or vice-captain or any of those terms, it’s just about being a leader in my own right, just doing what I do to lead by example and just help out the young guys and help out the group … it’s stuff I’d normally do.”But you want to make sure you get the right things done and the team’s preparing well. All in all the whole group is preparing as leaders, they’re going out there and leading by example in their own right. That’s a good sign for this group going forward and just looking forward to a few more training sessions, but I think everyone’s starting to adapt well to the conditions and looking forward to this practice match.”Having been coached by each of Tim Nielsen, Mickey Arthur and Darren Lehmann before Langer’s arrival, Siddle said the difference in styles was noticeable. The word most often used to describe Langer was again used when Siddle pondered the approach of Langer to a job he had first applied for as far back as 2011 – intensity.”He’s very intense. I think people could understand the way he went about the game when he played, how switched on and how hard he worked,” Siddle said. “I think we probably get a good understanding that’s how he’s coaching regime’s going to be. It started off like that, which is enjoyable. He knows his plans, knows the way he wants the team to go and I think the boys are getting a good feel for that over these first couple of days.”I’ve had a few coaches over my time in the role as a player, but it’s always fresh when a new coach, a new person comes in, their personality and they way they want to coach and lead the team. It always gives a good vibe around the group and with the younger guys here also it’s been enjoyable.”One area in which this adaptation is being attempted in a more rigorous fashion than before is in the calling up of a pair of Indian spin bowlers through the network of the spin consultant Sridharan Sriram – the legspinner Pardeep Sahu and the left-arm wristspinner KK Jiyas. This pair have been hired as part of an effort to simulate the offerings of Yasir Shah, who so confounded the Australians in the UAE in 2014, and Shadab Khan. Siddle noted this was a step up in preparation from what he had experienced on past tours.”I think in the past we’ve come into series, worked hard on spin but not specifically on what they’re bowling, the deliveries they bowl and the cues to watch as a batter,” Siddle said. “We’ve been lucky enough to get a couple of guys come in that are very good spin bowlers. I think the big focus is they’ve got two star legspinners, Yasir Shah who we’ve played before, a great player, and Shadab Khan, who’s been playing and we expect to line up.”So we’ve got a contest against those two guys, and having good discussions about different deliveries, what to watch, I think it’s been good for us tailenders as well to hear from different batters, the way they go about it, the way they watch the ball. It’s nice to hear from them and it gives us something to work on when we get in the nets. I definitely think it’s helped me personally and the other guys have definitely learned a lot from it.”Getty ImagesPakistan have struggled for traction in the concurrent Asia Cup being played in Dubai, but Siddle noted that the extra volume of cricket being played in the stadium will likely have a flow-on effect for the sort of pitch prepared for the Test match starting on October 7. Namely, it will be likely to take spin earlier in the game than its 2014 equivalent.”The Dubai wicket has had a lot of cricket played on it throughout this Asia Cup, so you can see the whole square’s being used a lot more,” Siddle said. “So I think the previous series when we came here, the wicket was a bit flatter, a bit more slate, so it took a few days to actually break up, but this series it looks like it’s going to break up a lot earlier so spin is going to play a part.”I think for me it’s going to be similar to what I do in Australia, it’s about holding up an end, building pressure and trying to put the batsmen under a lot of pressure to generate those wickets. I don’t think my plan changes a hell of a lot from different conditions. But probably more so here it’s about hitting the stumps, making them play a lot more and having the fielders in the right positions.”As for whether Siddle’s presence and experience will be useful in ensuring the Australian team does not let behavioural and cultural issues get out of hand in the UAE, despite the hot sun and unrelenting conditions, the 33-year-old is hopeful that the lessons of past tours will come in handy. “It’s hard to say,” he said. “Emotions come out in games and different things happen throughout matches, which you react to.”Hopefully just being around the group and just giving a bit of knowledge about conditions. I’ve played in the subcontinent a lot, I’ve played here once before, and it’s just about talking about those experiences. I got to play under some great guys on my first ever Test tour [in India in 2008], Haydos and Punter and Brett Lee, guys like that who’ve played a lot of cricket.”I’ve taken a lot of knowledge from them and hopefully I can pass a bit of that to these guys and watch them go forward. I think these days the boys have played a lot in the subcontinent, even the younger guys, so they’ve been exposed to those conditions, which is exciting. They’re not coming in here in an unknown world not knowing anything, so the young guys are preparing very well in the nets at the moment.”

Bhuvneshwar and Rayudu in focus ahead of Asia Cup squad selection

With Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni likely to return, the selectors have room to experiment without hurting the team’s chances of victory

Ankur Dhawan31-Aug-2018Like the premiere of an obscure film, highlighted by the ones that are not in attendance rather than the ones who are, the announcement of India’s squad for the Asia Cup might be headlined by those who are rested rather than those who are picked. That isn’t to undermine the importance of the tournament, but simply a corollary of a physically and mentally demanding, two-month tour of England that’s still a Test-and-a-half away from completion.It does, however, present India with one of four opportunities, leading up to the 2019 World Cup, to zero in on a middle-order batsman who can, ideally, also roll his arm over and delve deeper into a seemingly bottomless pace-bowling pool. With bilateral series against West Indies, Australia and New Zealand also coming up, India can afford to get funky with their selections now, without necessarily jeopardising their chances of winning the Asia Cup, especially considering that the experienced Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni are likely to return refreshed.Rohit to lead?India’s captain and all-format match-winner Virat Kohli had said that missing his Surrey county stint due to injury was a blessing in disguise, and his scores on the England tour have certainly corroborated that. While runs have flowed from his bat like a river, his team-mates have been largely parched for them, meaning that he has had to shoulder enormous responsibility. The effects of that, or a grueling schedule – it’s irrelevant which one – had begun to show at Lord’s, where Kohli was briefly hampered by a bad back. While his withdrawal might be commercially problematic for the tournament, there is a strong case for him to take a break, leaving his deputy Rohit to lead the team, as in the Nidhas Trophy, which India won.Bhuvneshwar to return?The BCCI had acknowledged the need to manage the workload of their premier fast bowlers after Bhuvneshwar Kumar was ruled out of the Test series in England (the first three Tests at the time).Jasprit Bumrah also had to deal with some injury worries, missing the limited-overs leg of the tour after hurting his thumb while attempting a return catch. He returned with a match-winning five-for at Trent Bridge, which only reinforced his importance in this team.After weeks of intense rehabilitation, Bhuvneshwar, too, returned to action with an impressive performance against South Africa A, picking up 3 for 33 in nine overs and showing no discernible discomfort while bowling or fielding.India could think of roping Bhuvneshwar back in and leaving Bumrah out, as a balancing act.Ambati Rayudu plays one on the leg side•PTI What about Jadhav and Rayudu?With Suresh Raina’s umpteenth foray into the ODI side in England reaping frugal returns, a fit-again Kedar Jadhav should walk back into the squad. He was put out of action by a hamstring injury sustained at the start of the IPL, and though it was not until this past week that he recovered enough to play a competitive match, a batting average that touches 40 and an uncanny bowling action will be hard for India to ignore.Meanwhile, Ambati Rayudu, who came off an IPL high only to suffer the yo-yo low, now looks set to restart his India career. The 32-year-old has officially passed his fitness test and, last Thursday, proved his value with a Man-of-the-Match performance against Australia A. He could be a viable option in the top order should the selectors think of resting KL Rahul.Pant, or Karthik, or both?Dinesh Karthik went to England in the form of his life, but like a broken umbrella during torrential rain, it betrayed him when it mattered most. The ODI decider in Headingley, where he chopped on for 21, was followed by four dismal Test innings, two of which ended in ducks. Rishabh Pant replaced him in Nottingham and has shown flashes of brilliance with the bat already – not least through the audacious six to get off the mark – and safe glovework against the Dukes ball. He could well take over as India’s back-up wicketkeeper in ODIs. That doesn’t mean it’s the end of the road for Karthik. With the Asia Cup taking place in conditions where the ball doesn’t seam or swing too much, he could yet add value as a lower-order hitter.Can Kaul keep his place?A death-overs specialist for Surisers Hyderabad, Siddarth Kaul wasn’t nearly as penetrative or economical for India in the England ODIs and, given the surge in the country’s fast bowling stocks, he could find it difficult to keep his place. Mohammed Siraj, with 29 wickets in his last four first-class matches and a four-wicket burst against Australia A in one-day cricket, could get a look-in at Kaul’s expense.

Stump mics have their uses but beware the manipulation

Before hailing stump mics as the cure to a persistent but minor irritant, cricket must pause to consider the side effects

Sambit Bal18-Feb-2019It’s hardly cricket’s gallery of shame – for there’s match-fixing and various forms of cheating and instances of graver misconduct – but in the first two months of this year, cricketers have brought varying levels of embarrassment on themselves and the game through the words they have spoken on and off the field.It has led to bans and suspensions and, crucially and somewhat alarmingly, exposed several levels of prejudices – sexism and misogyny in the case of Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul, racial profiling in the case of Sarfaraz Ahmed, and oblique homophobia in the case of Shannon Gabriel – among elite cricketers. On a wider level, it’s a reflection of the gap between expected behaviour and prevalent behaviour.The boundaries of acceptable behaviour and conduct have been redrawn in this more global, connected, but decidedly elite world the cricketers now inhabit. But it is one they are ill-prepared for on account of a combination of factors – background, lack of opportunities to develop societal skills, and the insularity that celebrity brings.Given where and to whom it was addressed, it was staggering that Sarfaraz was unable to grasp the terrible nature of his lapse – even assuming that it was a general venting of frustration, and he hadn’t intended for Andile Phehlukwayo to understand the meaning of .Just as in the case of Pandya – and to a lesser extent, Rahul – who couldn’t have excused his performance on the grounds that it was an extension of boy banter in a casual setting, it would have been no defence for the captain of Pakistan that the term isn’t as pejorative in the subcontinent where the abhorrent practice of coining nicknames from skin colours or other physical attributes isn’t uncommon, and those at the receiving end are resigned to it.

“The keys at the moment are in the hands of the home broadcasters and, in many cases, the live feed is produced by the home board. As it stands, it’s open to manipulation, or at the very least to accusations and perceptions of manipulation.”

It was right for the players to cop the punishment, but the question remains whether the accountability shouldn’t extend to their employers.As society evolves, lines are constantly redrawn. With a contemporary lens, a lot of on-field banter now part of cricket folklore becomes, at the very least, cringe-worthy. Consider this exchange – perhaps apocryphal – between Ian Botham and Rodney Marsh, among cricket’s most celebrated sledges.But who’s going to drum this in to the players, who come from different backgrounds and cultures, and don’t receive the same education or sensitisation, but who must always be judged by a uniform code of behaviour?Cricket treats itself as a corporate entity on most counts and, apart from being heroes and celebrities, cricketers are highly remunerated employees of cricket boards and franchises. Enormous resources are spent – rightfully so – on developing their primary skills, but since they are also the game’s primary ambassadors judged for their conduct both on and off the field, should they not be adequately prepared? Franchise cricket has done its bit in exposing players to different cultures, but how much institutional training do the cricketers receive?Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul were banned for their controversial comments in a TV programme•Getty ImagesTwo of these three instances were brought to light because the stump mics were turned on, and given the nature of the transgressions, it’s difficult to feel sympathy for the players in question. But however tempting it might be to draw obvious conclusions, we must assess these two issues – on-field verbal transgressions and broadcasting of the chatter – separately.The ICC is now an enthusiastic advocate of the idea of keeping the mics on, which has received the unqualified support of Moeen Ali, who claimed in his recent autobiography to have been at the receiving end of a racial taunt that was not caught by mics.It is a persuasive argument. Switched-on stump mics have the potential to cut down personal abuse and bring greater accountability from players. The game needs its tensions and emotions, but once players are aware of repercussions, they are likely to stay within the line.And it can make the game both more accessible and entertaining for fans. MS Dhoni behind the stumps to spinners provides the perfect mix of insight, wisdom and hilarity for the television viewer who can now feel part of the plot. And for a sport in constant pursuit of finding new ways to engage the fans, this is an attractive option.

‘However tempting it might be to draw obvious conclusions, we must assess these two issues – on-field verbal transgressions and broadcasting of the chatter – separately.’

However, cricket must be wary of the potential dangers. To start with, it would only be natural, as FICA articulated, if players were concerned about the inconsistency of its application.The keys at the moment are in the hands of the home broadcasters and, in many cases, the live feed is produced by the home board. As it stands, it’s open to manipulation, or at the very least to accusations and perceptions of manipulation.During their last tour of India, the Australian cricket team complained about the selective airing of an exchange between Mathew Wade and Ravindra Jadeja. The reverse happened in Australia when the home broadcasters clipped out a mild spat between Jadeja and team-mate Ishant Sharma during a drinks break. The Indian team management felt it was mischievous.More interesting was the practice of making the stump mic the primary feed during certain overs. It produced some entertaining exchanges between Rishabh Pant and Tim Paine, which culminated in that photo Paine’s wife posted on Instagram going viral. But the fact remained it was the broadcasters who chose the overs, and a feeling persisted in the Indian camp that Pant, a young player on his first tour to Australia, might have been set up as easy prey.Just as in the cases of ball tampering, which are now invariably unearthed by the broadcasters and almost always expose the touring players, the selective use of stump mics has the potential of attracting accusations of bias.And finally, stump mics have limited surveillance value. They cover only a fraction of the ground, and as demonstrated in the case of Joe Root and Gabriel, the recording can sometimes be partial – it was that which prompted Gabriel to release his part of the conversation. ​Most of these incidents, of course, occur in the vicinity of the stump mics, the stumps being the focus of cricket’s central confrontation. But that doesn’t mean no infractions take place in other parts of the field, and those these mics can’t capture.Those who abuse as a tactic will simply get smarter about it. Already, there are examples of players muttering under their breath, or with their hands covering their mouths. Finding a way around the stump mic is unlikely to be an insurmountable challenge. It could also encourage entrapment of gullible cricketers – not everyone has the wit or the felicity of language to respond in kind to provocations – by those more adept at the art of sledging.Before hailing stump mics as the cure to a persistent but minor irritant, cricket must pause to consider these side effects.

The case for a bigger, better Women's T20 Challenge next year

With close to 30,000 people attending the four games in Jaipur, we wonder what a few sensible tweaks can do for the women’s game in India

Annesha Ghosh in Jaipur13-May-2019She has only ever played T20 cricket internationally, and has a batting average of 4.75 there from nine innings. But two-two-two-four off the last four balls from Amelia Kerr in the Women’s T20 Challenge final to clinch victory for Supernovas, and Radha Yadav is a star in the making now. Exactly what a platform like a kind-of-IPL is meant to do for women’s cricket in India.All told, it was a success. Four matches. Largely with good turnouts (13,000-odd were at the final). Three of the four games were played under lights, there was some excellent action and close finishes, Velocity choosing to play for qualification to the final instead of going for a win against Supernovas perhaps the only negative.Lots to celebrate then, but there are a couple of things to think about for the organisers and powers that be.Let there be light, as much as possibleIndia haven’t played a day-night or night-only home international fixture since March 2016. The first non-day match they played, at home or away, since that World T20 game in Mohali was at the 2018 World T20, in the semi-final, which they lost to England. Failing to account for the dew factor and the lack of an idea of the intricacies of fielding under lights – apart from other things – abetted their loss.ALSO READ: A high-quality advertisement for women’s cricket in IndiaAt the Women’s T20 Challenge, nearly a dozen catches were shelled – by Indian and overseas players, young and experienced. The swirling ball against the backdrop of the night sky posed all three teams a challenge. At the T20 World Cup next year, in Australia, two of India’s four league-stage games will begin at 7pm local time, the remaining two at 2pm. The 2021 ODI World Cup, too, will have a sprinkling of day-night and night games.With two world tournaments in the next two years, there is a case for the BCCI to consider hosting a few games under lights during the home series against South Africa later this year, and ensure a few night fixtures across all domestic tournaments, including the age-group competitions, in the upcoming season.”Playing under lights is actually challenging because the whole atmosphere changes, the way the wind blows, with the light and the way the ball travels on the field,” said India and Velocity batsman Veda Krishnamurthy, who took most catches (and, more importantly, dropped none) in the tournament. “So, at least if we start playing T20s in the evening [that will help] and also help bring in more crowd.”Around 13,000 people turned up for the final•BCCIThere’s no blockbuster without the publicityA standalone identity, in a non-metro city, held on the sidelines of the men’s IPL were all vital when it came to testing the waters for a possible women’s IPL, or a short three-team event to start with. If the response to the four-match competition – on social media and at the ground – is anything to go by, the Women’s T20 Challenge was more than a sleeper hit.Scheduling the final on the weekend, with a 7.30pm start, allowed appreciable prime-time viewership, the high-quality cricket in the final-ball thriller only bolstering the case for women’s cricket in India to have a bigger, a more expanded T20 league of its own.As crowd turnout goes, the attendance at Sawai Mansingh Stadium grew with each night fixture – from roughly 4,000 in the opening match to 7,000-plus in the second, to over 13,000 for the final. Even the only match with a 3.30pm start, in the sweltering Jaipur heat, had nearly 3,500 people in attendance at the stadium.Be informed, these are numbers for a tournament that didn’t even have much advertisement around the stadium premises. Locals – cab drivers, store owners, hotel owners, children and women – who came to watch the matches said that TV commercials, though sporadic, carried by the host broadcaster during the closing stages of the IPL’s league phase played a part in piquing their interest.Stick to the non-metrosImagine, then, what Women’s T20 Challenge signage at the airport (which had many Rajasthan Royals hoardings well after the team had been eliminated), the railway station, and in the immediate vicinity of the stadium could have done. No reason, then, for the BCCI to doubt the cricket-watching appetite – for women’s games – among Indians, right?”Smaller cities could work, because of the curiosity factor…,” Mithali Raj, who also called for an expanded competition, said. “We could add one or two more teams, but [making] it a double-leg [competition], where we could play each team twice, will make it more interesting because any team can beat any team in the league. That gives every player and team a few more games.”Back in the day, to promote the sport under WCAI [the now-defunct Women’s Cricket Association of India], we tried to play at smaller places where a lot of people came to watch maybe because of the curiosity factor, but we used to attract a lot of people. So that isn’t a bad idea.”Worth thinking about.

'The first six months I didn't enjoy the job much, it was very hard'

Australia coach Justin Langer sits down with ESPNcricinfo to talk about his evolution as a coach, leading the team through a crisis and why this Ashes might be different

Daniel Brettig29-Jul-2019In the middle of the 2009 Ashes series, a few months before he retired from playing and began a decade in coaching for Australia, Western Australia and Perth Scorchers, Justin Langer inadvertently told the world he thought James Anderson could be “a bit of a pussy if he is worn down”.The comment was part of a personal email to Australia’s then coach Tim Nielsen by way of advice on how to tackle England in that year’s five-Test contest. After it was leaked, Langer was the subject of a major story in the , published just as the tourists were trying to recover from a first Test match defeat at Lord’s in 75 years.Looking back on the episode as he reflected on a decade in coaching, Langer says, sitting in the lobby of the Australian team hotel in Birmingham, that it was an early part of his education in public scrutiny – an area in which he has faced unrelenting examination over his first year as Australia’s coach.”One of the boys left the email Tim had printed in the change room at Glamorgan there. It got passed to Steve James, who had been a player at Glamorgan for a long time, who then decided to keep it until it suited him or his newspaper, which was in the [third] Test. And you just learn very quickly that: one, it’s an industry, two, people will twist and turn it however they want, and three, people have got no real concern for who the person is who’s got feelings – they’ll just use it however they want. Good grounding, I guess.”Tim Nielsen said I’d played a lot of cricket in England, I’d played against some of the players, and did I have any thoughts? So it was a pretty innocent question and I just wrote a few words to Tim as a mate and a guy who’d been an assistant coach when I’d been there. It was a personal letter that then got called a dossier. It was a bit like when we took our shoes off at Edgbaston [during the World Cup], all of a sudden they’re calling it ‘earthing’ and all that, all this psychobabble, it was just taking our shoes off because it’s a nice thing to do at a cricket ground.”Much was made of the Anderson comment, but Langer regards it as a measure of both the Englishman and his own evolution as a coach that the same word would not be used again.”Now that was my way of just talking about his body language. When we played against James Anderson as a young man, we felt that if we got on top of him, hit anything loose he bowled, because his body language would drop a little bit. I’d take back the word I used. That wouldn’t be my style now, that’s for sure, but it was two Aussie blokes talking to each other about someone’s body language.”Do I think that now about James Anderson? Absolutely not, and I hope you write this in the article: James Anderson has turned into a brilliant, great English fast bowler. He will be the person we talk about most when we go through our plans for winning this Ashes. When he was a young man he was different, and that happens with most. When I was a young batsman, I was dour, I couldn’t hit the ball off the square, I probably didn’t smile much.Justin Langer looks back at his time with Perth Scorchers and Western Australia as vital to his development as a coach•Getty Images”That was my interpretation of him, having played against him. I didn’t know him at all. That was our experience of his body language as a young player. Would I say that now? No way in the world. He is a great bowler and we respect him enormously, I personally respect him for his longevity, for his skill. The greatest compliment we can give James Anderson now – the same person who wrote that ten years ago, [not] expecting it to get into public hands, certainly wouldn’t say that about him now.”

Learning from rejection

Trial and error, setbacks and achievements have all been a part of Langer’s coaching story, for he has been denied as many coaching roles as he has won. “A lot of people don’t know this: when Mickey Arthur got the job as head coach of Western Australia [in 2010], I applied for that job as well and that was literally straight out of the game,” he says. “I thought, ‘Oh yeah, I’ve got good leadership, I know the game, no worries.’ But then Mickey got the job and I’m glad he did because I had to find some grounding somewhere else, and that was three years working with the Australian team, and I learned a lot of lessons then.”When Mickey got the Australian job, I also applied for that, and I wasn’t ready for that, but I still applied because people kept saying, ‘You’ve got leadership and you know the game, so you should apply for it.’ It was a a really tough experience going through that process. I’m glad I went through it, and I’m also glad I didn’t get the job then, because then I had six years at Western Australia. There’s no way I could’ve done the job I’ve done for 14 months without having that six years’ experience.”It couldn’t have been better grounding. It was all the same issues, all the same problems, just with less scrutiny. I’ve learned how to deal with it and I feel confident to deal with people, game situations, game plans, cricket. But what I had to learn was the scrutiny of the job, and that’s just another part of my evolution as a coach.ALSO READ: Newlands scandal ended reverse swing arms race – Paine“You’re always evolving and learning, and that’s one of the great things about the job. If you don’t, you might as well give up. I’m certainly doing it. The first six months of my job was so hard – I didn’t enjoy the job much.”From detailed deliberations about how to reintegrate Steven Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft to the team after their bans for ball-tampering in Cape Town last year, indifferent results for the ODI and Test teams in their absence, to the many and varied requirements of a new broadcast rights deal that reaped Cricket Australia A$1.18 billion but left the team with many more obligations than previously, Langer was in up to his neck. He was working, too, with a largely inherited support staff, under contract until the end of this year’s Ashes series. But the team’s smiling visage, he insists, was genuine.”I’ve said forever, my whole playing career and my whole coaching career: if they’re relaxed and smiling and enjoying it, they’re going to play better anyway,” he says. “I think they go hand in hand actually.”We’d got smashed and it took great courage, but it was a new group of guys who came in, and they were loving the fact they were playing for their country. You don’t fake it. We had to improve our behaviours a bit, on and off the field, and that was okay, but we were just doing what we thought was the right thing to do.”

Emotional strain

In the wake of a sapping Test series against India, where the Australians did well to be 1-1 going into Boxing Day but then saw things unravel quickly over the final two Tests, Langer was not always pleasant to be around. This was no surprise to those who had seen him grumpy with WA and Scorchers, but the depths to which he was falling with increasing frequency were somewhat oblivious to Langer until he was confronted by the sight of his wife, Sue, in tears over breakfast.”We got to day three or day four of the last Test in Sydney and my family had been over for Boxing Day and for the SCG Test match,” Langer says. “I’ve known my wife since I was 14 years old, so she knows everything about me, and they were leaving. I had to get in the team car to go to the ground at 8.15am. They were leaving that day, and we were at breakfast at 8 o’clock, and my wife started crying at the breakfast table in front of my daughters.Australia coach: a job that requires someone to wear many hats•Getty Images”I said, ‘What’s going on?’ I never see my wife cry – we know everything about each other. She said, ‘I just don’t like what’s happening here. I don’t like what it’s doing to you, I don’t like what it’s doing to us. People are so mean – what people are saying about you and the team and Australian cricket’. That was a real eye-opener for me, that it was affecting my family.”Others saw signs too. Among them was Malcolm Conn, formerly an award-winning cricket journalist and now the communications manager for Cricket New South Wales, who saw Langer’s testy back and forth with the ‘s Tom Decent over the issue of Glenn Maxwell and how he had been given undertakings regarding CA’s plans for him in the winter of 2018, which turned out to be unfounded.”I got, I’d say, two-out-of-ten grumpy with the journalist in Sydney, and I was also amazed at the backlash of that as well,” Langer says. “I apologised straight after the event, but I realised [from] the way people said, ‘He’s getting angry, he’s losing it.’ I didn’t feel that but my wife was getting upset – that was a real moment.”I’ve said privately and publicly a few times if I look back to my career: 1993 when I got dropped for the first time – really tough time, but pivotal in my life. I got dropped in 2001 – really, really tough time, but pivotal in my life. I look to January 2019 in Sydney – really tough time, but I’ve got no doubt it’ll be a massive part of my evolution as a coach. I got a really nice email from Malcolm Conn, just after that press conference. He gave me some really good advice. He knows what it was, but when I’m getting that sort of feedback from my wife, that sort of feedback from the team, I knew I had to find ways to get better, and hopefully I’ve done that.”

Respect for Trevor Bayliss

Langer takes inspiration from, among others, England’s coach Trevor Bayliss. Famed for his ability to keep calm at even the moments of greatest strain for the teams he has coached, Bayliss left a vivid memory in Langer’s mind when they crossed paths in Dubai in 2009. Langer was on his way to England; Bayliss, coach of Sri Lanka at the time, was on his way back home from Lahore, where the Sri Lanka and ICC officials team buses were machine-gunned in a terrorist attack.”I just remember his calmness. I’ve got a lot of respect for him. He’s just won the World Cup, he’s done some really good things in cricket.”It’s great to see someone like him, who’s gone right through the ranks to now be a World Cup-winning coach, I think that’s brilliant. He’s a great, shining light for coaching. We always get along very well, and I really like the journey he’s taken. [The World Cup win is] a feather in his cap and a reward for the hard work he’s done over many years, and it helps to elevate coaching. I think coaching in cricket is really immature, if you think about the other codes.”Just how far Langer’s own coaching has been elevated with time will be demonstrated by how Australia tackle the task of winning an Ashes series in England for the first time since 2001. Ask him to ruminate on how the team led by Mark Taylor was able to overcome a 0-1 deficit and the captain’s own form slump to win 3-2 in 1997, but the 2005 team could not, despite its bevy of great players, and it is patently clear the result still grates.”Our team then was a great team and no one can ever deny that. But some things happened, didn’t they?” he says. “Glenn stepped on the ball. I’ll say it until I die – you take the best players out of your team in any sport, it’s going to have an impact, and it did. McGrath’s on top of his game – he got his 500th wicket the game before – he’s bowling beautifully to Marcus Trescothick. You take him out, a few of the players for the first time are struggling a little bit with form.”It was a great series, a real arm-wrestle. The same team fought back two years later and won 5-0. It was an unusual tour that, 2005, and we’ll take stuff from it this year. But we’re certainly not the team we were in 2005. That was literally a great cricket team, probably seven or eight all-time greats, a couple of very good players. I was a good player and we had some all-time great players.Steven Smith, Justin Langer and David Warner during the Australia World Cup squad’s trip to Gallipoli•Cricket Australia”This is different. We’ve got a couple of great players this time, we’ve got a couple of aspiring great players, some very good players, and we’ve got some kids learning the ropes. Very different to compare this team to 2005, 1997, 1993 or 1989.”

Secret to Ashes success?

In an Ashes squad of 17, Langer and the selection chairman Trevor Hohns have assembled a group with more than a few players who offer gritty, fighting qualities, but also plenty of experience playing the game in this part of the world.”The vision early on to have us playing some Australia A cricket and those three red-ball games, hopefully that will give us a kick-start into the Ashes,” Langer says. “The fact we kept players like Marnus Labuschagne, Cameron Bancroft and Peter Siddle playing county cricket – so, as many Australian players playing red-ball cricket as possible – that was all part of the planning for it.”Equally England will have some players who have played some red-ball cricket as well. We’ve got eight guys, I think, who’ve just been solely focused on red-ball cricket for the last few months, and plus the one game the other day.”One of the most intriguing choices was Bancroft, who comes back into the fold at the same time as Smith and Warner. Langer and Bancroft have enjoyed a close relationship as batsman and mentor for years in WA, but Langer is adamant that sentiment had nothing at all to do with the 26-year-old’s presence in the squad. Indeed, he points out that Bancroft’s county stint with Durham was perhaps even more valuable than most.”Selection is about performance isn’t it? He, like David and Steve Smith, they’ve paid a very heavy penalty,” Langer says. “He came to Durham and he’s got to bat first on a really tough Durham wicket, because there’s no tosses over here. I remember talking to Marcus North weeks ago about it, and he said, it’s a very tough wicket up there, and he’s averaged 40-odd, got a couple of hundreds.ALSO READ: ‘I wasn’t as true to myself as I could have been’ – Bancroft battles back“Then he batted in a two-and-a-half-day game, and you’d have to say he was the standout batsman, just with true grit. I think to win over here we’re going to need batters who are really mentally strong, who’ve got a sound technique, who make runs. What he does is if he gets in, he usually gets hundreds. He likes to bat, to wear them down. He’s also a brilliant fieldsman – if he plays he’ll be a very good bat-pad to Nathan Lyon. He is a great slips fielder, which is important in English conditions, just a really good package.”He’s earned it on performance – a bloke who averages 56 in Shield cricket and averages 40-odd opening the batting in tough conditions in Durham and then plays like that [in Southampton]. He’s been selected on performance. When he came out of it he was the leading run scorer [for Australia] in South Africa in that [2018] Test series, so he can obviously play as well. There’s no sentiment there. We thought there were some tough selections, no doubt about that, but we felt he is in good form and he warrants selection through his performances.”How will Langer’s Australia respond to the question he once posed of James Anderson? For they are not only going to be facing a concerted challenge from England on the pitch but a strident campaign of criticism, abuse and booing from beyond the boundary. They know, more or less, what to expect, but they still need to cope with the challenge of fronting up to it day upon day for 25 days across five Tests. Resilience will be required – by the bucketload.”We’ve had a pretty good snapshot of what to expect from the crowds here in England,” Langer says. “We respect if that’s how they want to react, that’s fine – there’s nothing we can do about it. Our boys were brilliant throughout the World Cup, and I expect them to be brilliant dealing with it throughout the Ashes as well. I know it’s going to be tough on them. We’ll just get on with the job and play the best cricket we can.”That’s why it’s called Test cricket. It’s tough. That’s why we love the game so much. Physically, mentally, technically, you’ve got to be really strong. We talk about mental toughness, having a great technique. Bowlers have to have the physical endurance, batsmen have to have concentration. It’s a game of resilience, it’s like a marathon, and our blokes will be up for it. It’s the toughest part of the game.”

'I see myself as someone who could be the No. 1 allrounder some day'

The West Indies allrounder is happy to take the opportunities that come his way and not rush things, although, a maiden ODI hundred, against India, would be a sweet way to end the year

Saurabh Somani13-Dec-2019Roston Chase is something of an enigma in the West Indies team. He made a match-saving hundred in only his second Test, but averages only 31.38 in the format. For a bowler who comes in as second or third change most times, he has better innings figures in Test cricket than Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall, Courtney Walsh, Andy Roberts and Joel Garner. And while he’s got the all-round skills to be a valuable member of the one-day team, Chase has been in only 22 of the 59 ODIs that West Indies have played since he made his debut in the format.None of that is evident when you watch him go about his job. He has a languid calm with the bat and a business-like approach with the ball. It’s much the same when he speaks. He was left out of West Indies’ squad for the World Cup, a decision that puzzled a fair few people, but he has marked his comeback to the ODI set-up with spectacular returns. In West Indies’ 3-0 sweep of Afghanistan last month, Chase was the Man of the Series, as much for his bowling as his batting.”In the team, I see myself as an allrounder now,” Chase said. “When I first started, I wasn’t too confident in my bowling. But over the last couple of years I’ve worked with Mushy [former Pakistan legspinner Mushtaq Ahmed currently consulting with West Indies] and I’ve been working very hard on my bowling.”I really see myself as someone who could be the No. 1 allrounder in the world some day, so I try to work hard on both aspects of my game. I’m learning a bit more about my bowling as my career goes on. I’m very happy with where it’s at right now, but I want to keep improving so that I can give my team the best chance of winning more games and series.”

In the three ODIs against Afghanistan, Chase made 145 runs at 72.50, and batted at No. 4 twice in three games. But he had been picked more for his offspin, or at least that’s how he saw it.”My role in the one-day team, as Polly [captain Kieron Pollard] spoke to me before the series, was merely to be a bowler. In case I got a chance to bat early or we are in trouble, my role was just to bat what I know. I didn’t really have to go out there and improvise. I just had to bat how I bat in a Test match: play the ball on merit and if I get any bad ball, just put them away. Just keep it ticking over.”Getting the opportunity to bat at No. 4, I got some runs [94 in the first ODI]. And then in the last game, I batted at No. 7 and got some runs as well. Shai Hope played a brilliant innings, getting a hundred, and I helped him to take us over the line. The required rate was a run a ball, so it was a pressure situation seeing that I was the last recognised batsman. I thought I played it well.”I’m maturing in white-ball cricket. My role in this team is to just tick it over, not do anything extravagant. Rotate the strike and play what I know.”For all the skills he’s shown under pressure, it’s surprising that Chase hasn’t cracked T20 cricket yet. He has only played five T20s overall, three of those for Barbados Tridents in the 2018 CPL.

“I wouldn’t call myself a Test specialist, but I’m not going to rush it. As I get more experience with white-ball cricket and more opportunities to showcase my talent, I think that will come. I’m not really thinking too hard about it or rushing that part of my game.”That’s also how Chase’s game has appeared, calm and unrushed, right from the start.
In Dominica in 2017 against Pakistan, Chase had batted over six hours and was one over shy of saving the Test when No. 11 Shannon Gabriel played the infamous slog that gave Misbah-ul-Haq and Younis Khan a winning farewell. Because of the drama in the end, Chase’s contributions in the game are often overlooked. He made 69 and 101 not out and took five wickets.”That was a tough one, seeing the position we were in and then the result that came out of the game,” Chase said. “In the first innings, I got struck on my arm and I had an injury. It was one of those innings where I tried to bat deep and tried to fight as hard as I could. It wasn’t enough in the end. We still ended up losing that match and the series, but it was still a good game. We fought to the end, tried our best. That is a bittersweet one for me.”Did he feel upset with Gabriel for playing that thoughtless shot?”At that time, I was actually emotionless. I didn’t know what to do. I didn’t know what to think. It was happening in front of my eyes, but I didn’t really know what was going on. Can’t say I was vexed at Gabriel. It was only when I sat down and thought about it after the game that I just realised how close we were to saving the Test. It just hurt a bit more then. I’ve never spoken to him about it. I just let that be that and moved on from it.”Chase nearly saved the Dominica Test against Pakistan in 2017, only to be thwarted by his batting partner right in the end•AFPIt was even more bittersweet because of what had come before. In the previous Test, Chase had weathered hostile spells from Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Abbas to crack a century on his home ground in a West Indian win.”I think that one is my favourite hundred because I did it in front of my home crowd. My family and my friends came to watch me. The Kensington Oval is one of my favourite grounds to play on as well. It was a very good innings and I thought that was the best I’ve ever played in Test cricket.”Chase also has scored two Test hundreds against India. His maiden one helped save the game in Kingston in 2016, and then there was the away hundred in Hyderabad in 2018 against the triple spin threat of R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja and Kuldeep Yadav and the furious reverse swing of Umesh Yadav.And earlier this year, he had his best moment with the ball in international cricket, once again in his hometown, when he took 8 for 60 in a huge Test win over England.”I never thought I would get eight wickets in a Test match, especially in that game. In the first innings, we bowled them out very cheaply [for 77] and I didn’t even bowl a ball. I thought that if I got to bowl in the second innings, it would probably be just a holding role. But I came on, the ball was coming out well, and again, it was in front of my home crowd. I just find that whenever I’m in front of the home crowd, it is a different feeling. You just always want to impress. Give the fans something to cherish or talk about. When I got the wicket of Joe Root [his second wicket in the innings], my confidence went over the roof. From there, everything just went well for me.”In fact, in 2019, things have gone fairly well for Chase, despite the World Cup snub. In one-day cricket, particularly, he seems to have found his groove. He’s striking with the bat at 83.03 and he’s been entrusted with the ball a lot more too, delivering with an average of 31.62 and an economy rate of 3.95.If one final box is ticked during the upcoming ODI series against India, Chase might look back at this year as the one in which he established himself as a 50-overs allrounder.”If I get to go early, I’d like to get a maiden ODI century. Just look to do as well for my team as I can. With the ball, just look to continue where I left off in the Afghanistan series. Be that bowler for the captain in the middle overs.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus