Is player power in football even worse at this level?

The concept of ‘player power’ was once a mere zit on the beautiful game, but over the years it has slowly mutated into an inoperable tumour. Football clubs up and down the country, across all divisions, are continually held to ransom by the demands and ultimatums of their narcissistic employees. However, despite its repeated occurrence in domestic football, I would argue that it’s even more rife on the International stage.

Nowadays it’s painfully obvious that our nation’s stars harbour an unwavering allegiance with their respective club. The juvenile tug of war between club and country is an all too familiar affair, which threatens to dominate the headlines once more should Andy Carroll pick up an injury over the next few days. How many times have we heard troublesome stories of players feigning injury just to secure a prolonged period of rest?

An international call-up is no longer an honour but an extra circular activity that players can chose to participate in. Last summer’s squad selection debacle highlighted a number of players, including Micah Richards and Peter Crouch, who refused to be listed on standby. Whether they believe they should be the first name on the teamsheet is irrelevant, the level of egotism on display is frightening.

There are a growing number of former England internationals that have gone one-step further and retired altogether, dishing out the tired cliché that they have been ‘unfairly treated’. In the minority of cases it’s understandable, especially if their devotion towards the national team has never been questioned. However, it astonishes me that players can even contemplate refusing a distress call from their country, just imagine how different Euro 2012 might have been with Paul Scholes pulling the strings in midfield?

Without wanting to be cruel, the majority of players that have omitted their name from potential selection are no great loss. Unfortunately this is not the case with the latest retiree John Terry, who in the eyes of many remains England’s best defender. Perhaps no one knows this better than Terry himself and I fear he has made this drastic decision just to prove a point, knowing full well that if England look fragile in his absence, the cries calling for his return will quickly increase in volume.

Thankfully England are not the only team to suffer the perils of player power, with their dismal performance during the summer overshadowed by events in the Dutch camp. The Netherlands were heavily tipped to excel at Euro 2012 despite being drawn in the ‘group of death’ and possessing a defence that resembled a house of cards. However, their winless campaign was dogged by rumours of unrest featuring the tantrums of part-time player Rafael van der Vaart and the egotistical nature of Robin van Persie.

Their plight was epitomised no more so by the performances of Gregory van der Wiel, who appeared to abandon his defensive duties at every inconceivable moment. His selfish displays were perhaps unsurprising given that former footballer Johan Derksen, now chief editor of Dutch football magazine Voetbal International, revealed that he had spent a lot of time “doing a lot of things, except playing football”.

He’s running his own fashion line, working on his music and getting his hair done every day. The players did not see him without headphones on.” (goal.com)

Further evidence perhaps that you can have the best players in the world and not have the best team.

Roy Hodgson cannot rely on the same luxuries with England as he could in the Premier League. Should he make a mistake, he risks upsetting an entire nation and if relations between individual players break down beyond repair, there is no transfer kitty to find a suitable substitute. The pool of potential replacements is significantly smaller, especially in England’s case.

Perhaps this is why morale in the Spanish squad always appears sky high. There are three or four exceptional individuals vying for every position in the starting XI, but unlike with the Dutch this helps create healthy competition. Manager Vicente del Bosque recently admitted he couldn’t find a place in his latest squad for the brilliance of Juan Mata, which highlights how each player must act as model professionals, in every sense of the word, just to maintain their inclusion.

England on the other hand have several indispensible figures inclduing the likes of Joe Hart, Wayne Rooney, Steven Gerrard and Ashley Cole. It was perhaps the Chelsea defenders status as one of the best left-backs in the world coupled with his impending milestone that ensured he avoided a more severe punishment for his Twitter outburst. However, the 31-year-old needs to justify his selection tonight, especially considering it’s no longer only Evertonians calling for Leighton Baines to be installed as the first choice left-back.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Swindon manager Paolo Di Canio was recently asked about the subject of player power in his latest blog with the BBC and accurately summarises the growing consensus amongst supporters.

There is a different way in England, the players seem to be able to do what they want and you have to ask yourself: is this why the national team is not going close to winning something at the moment?

Join me on Twitter @theunusedsub where I would like to remind everyone that it’s Non-League Day tomorrow, so why not support your local club.

How starting 2018/19 on the road could affect Tottenham’s chances of top four finish

According to London Evening Standard, Tottenham have been given an extra 48 hours to decide where they’ll play their Premier League home games next season.

Premier League rules state that no club can play their home games at two venues in the same season, but the project to rebuild White Hart Lane after a season-long stay at Wembley has fallen behind schedule and may not be completed for the start of the coming campaign.

Daniel Levy and the club’s other paymasters were supposed to make a decision by the end of May but the Premier League initially extended the deadline until this Wednesday. Per London Evening Standard though, they’ve now been given until Friday with three options seemingly on the table: either play the whole of next season at Wembley, convince Richard Scudamore and his colleagues to make an exception to Premier League rules or reverse the early fixtures of 2018/19 likely resulting in their first three top flight outings being away from home.

The latter scenario may initially seem superficial change, but to what extent could it affect Tottenham’s campaign and their chances of holding onto a Champions League qualification slot for another season? Three clubs have been in exactly the same situation before at Premier League level, so here’s a quick look at what history tells us about Tottenham’s predicament…

Blackpool – 2010/11

What happened? Due to rebuilding at Bloomfield Road Blackpool started their first and to date only Premier League campaign by playing four of their first five fixtures away from home. Two of them proved disastrous – battered by Chelsea at Stamford Bridge and Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium to incur a ten-goal deficit – but the other two produced surprising wins as Ian Holloway’s boys beat relegation rivals Wigan and Newcastle.

Did it make a difference? Not as much as it could have done, simply because Blackpool carried huge momentum with them from the Championship and proved to be something of an unknown proposition for many of the clubs they faced in the early stages of the campaign. In fact, the Seasiders ended up finishing 10th in the Premier League’s away table, compared to a mere 19th in the home one.

How did the season end? Relegation by a single point, although that was predominantly caused by a run of just two wins from Blackpool’s last 18 games. That being said, they did beat Liverpool and Tottenham at Bloomfield Road that season, so perhaps those early visits to Chelsea and Arsenal would have panned out incredibly differently if they’d been played at home when Blackpool clearly had momentum on their side.

Liverpool – 2016/17

What happened? Jurgen Klopp’s first full season in charge at Anfield was somewhat curtailed by the rebuilding of the Main Stand, obliging Liverpool to play their first three fixtures of the campaign on the road and producing three different results in the process – a dramatic 4-3 win over Arsenal, a shock 2-0 defeat to Burnley and a 1-1 draw with Tottenham.

Did it make a difference? On the surface, not a huge one. Liverpool grabbed two important results against big six rivals away from home that eventually lead them to finishing in the top four, and in some ways it was probably an unforeseen benefit to play those games so early in the campaign when a lack of true match sharpness acted as something of a leveller. Later in the season, Liverpool won the reverse fixtures at Anfield as well.

How did the season end? Liverpool finished above Arsenal to make the top four but also fell one win short of beating Manchester City to third place. That difference could well have been the defeat at Turf Moor; although the Reds have made a habit of losing on the road under Klopp to lesser teams built upon organised, deep-sitting defences, Sean Dyche’s side seemed to catch them cold that day – scoring two incisive breakaways. At another point in the campaign, perhaps Liverpool would have done enough to win.

West Ham – 2017/18

What happened? Due to the World Championships being held in the capital that summer, West Ham were forced to play their first three games on the road as the club converted the much-maligned London Stadium back into a footballing venue, swapping the running track for extra seats.

And although there were other factors, it had a huge impact on West Ham’s results, dropping to 20th place on the opening day after a 4-0 defeat at Old Trafford while also losing to eventual relegation rivals Southampton and Newcastle.

Did it make a difference? A massive one. The Hammers started the season on the back foot and would spend all but seven of the Premier League’s first 19 matchdays in the relegation zone.

Furthermore, the results – and the angered response to them – inevitably influenced the club’s decision to sack Slaven Bilic in early November and replace him with David Moyes. That instantly changed the mentality of West Ham’s season; they were meant to be masterminding a break into the top seven, but spent the remainder of it fighting off relegation to the Championship instead.

How did the season end? The Irons eventually finished up nine points clear of the drop line but it was only during the latter stages of the campaign in which they truly pulled away from relegation bother. And even that wasn’t enough to keep Moyes in the job, having since been replaced by Manuel Pellegrini due to a negative style of football that was no doubt caused by the mess he inherited just eight games on from West Ham’s away-game stretch.

It would be wrong to describe it as the most determining factor, but those early results went a long way to defining West Ham’s season, which was so disastrous it almost manifested into a full-scale riot at the London Stadium during a 3-0 loss to Burnley.

Tottenham – 2018/19

Which games would change? The fixtures are officially announced on Thursday, meaning Tottenham will still have around 24 hours to make their decision, and the quality of the opposition could well be a decisive factor in this.

Tottenham’s biggest struggles away from home last season were against top six rivals, a 3-1 victory at Stamford Bridge being the only exception in four defeats and one draw at Old Trafford, so a batch of heavyweight contests during the early weeks of the campaign could cost them dearly.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

How will it affect them? History aside, the big concern for the Lilywhites is how every season to date under Mauricio Pochettino has started half-paced. In fact, from the first 48 games of the last three seasons (16 per term), Tottenham have won less than half, 22, and lost eight to average just 1.75 points per game.

To give some context, Tottenham required an average of more than two points per game last season to finish fourth. Add in the extra disadvantage of beginning the season with three away games and Spurs could really end up in a compromising position before the campaign truly gets going.

Missing out on top four? It’s certainly a possibility considering the competitiveness at Tottenham’s end of the Premier League looks set to jump up another gear in 2018/19. Starting the season with three modest results could well be decisive come the close of the campaign, although the counter-argument is how the power of the new White Hart Lane – which will far more like home than Wembley ever has for Spurs fans – will help Tottenham over the line for those rescheduled home clashes.

The overriding message though, is not to downplay the psychological importance those first three games could have.

[brid autoplay=”true” video=”253257″ player=”12034″ title=”Watch Flashback Spurs and the ‘Lasagne Gate’ incident”]

In Focus: Pastore turns down Liverpool move

According to Italian journalist Gianluca Di Marzio, Paris Saint-Germain attacker Javier Pastore has turned down the chance to join Liverpool.

What’s the story?

Pastore, who is valued at £16.2m by transfermarkt.co.uk, is widely expected to leave PSG this month after seven years with the French outfit.

The Argentine has scored five times in 19 appearances in all competitions during the 2017-18 campaign, but his time in Paris looks to be coming to an end.

According to Italian journalist Gianluca Di Marzio, Liverpool made an offer of between £22m and £35m for the 28-year-old.

Pastore, however, was not said to be interested in the move as he wants to return to Serie A.

Inter Milan are believed to be the favourites for Pastore, and the Italian side could step up their interest after allowing Portugal international Joao Mario to join West Ham United.

Do Liverpool need another attacker?

Having sold Philippe Coutinho to Barcelona earlier this month, it is not a surprise that Liverpool are being linked with a move for a number of attackers.

Leicester City’s Riyad Marrez was believed to be on the club’s radar, but talk of a deal for the Algerian international has gone cold over the last week or so.

Pastore would have been perfect, with the Argentine a classy performer who is capable of operating in a number of positions in the final third of the field.

Liverpool’s 1-0 defeat at Swansea City on Monday night showed that Jurgen Klopp’s side are still far from the full package, and fresh blood is needed in order to challenge for titles.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Monaco’s Thomas Lemar, meanwhile, now looks set to stay at the Ligue 1 champions until at least the end of the season in what is another blow to Liverpool.

The January transfer window closes next week, and Liverpool fans will be hoping that their club has something up its sleeve.

Empty promises or a show of passion from this Tottenham ace?

The sense of Champions League or bust doesn’t just seem to be a sentiment held by the manager at Tottenham. Both Jan Vertonghen and Hugo Lloris have hinted in recent weeks that failure to achieve that coveted fourth place could prompt them both to reconsider their futures at the club.

More upheaval is possibly the last thing Spurs want this summer if they genuinely have designs on Premier League success next season. Therefore it will be music to Spurs fans ears to hear that midfield maestro Christian Eriksen has today come out in a show of loyalty to the club that saw so much potential in him last summer. Speaking to the Mail he confirmed that he was in it for the long haul in the North London:

“I don’t know how other guys are thinking, but I’m happy where I am, and hopefully we’ll get to the Champions League anyway,” he said. 

“I think it is important for the club, and the calibre of player that could come, or stay. I think everybody wants to go to the Champions League. I’ve tried it before at Ajax, and you see everything is bigger, the atmosphere, the TV rights, the people watching. The Europa League is great, but the Champions League is what everybody wants, it’s the best place to play.”

Eriksen is clearly saying all the right things, but whether he means any of it we will surely find out during the run in and in the summer itself.  For Spurs, keeping hold of the diminutive Dane is of the upmost importance. The prodigious youngster is the man to build this Spurs side around for years to come; with his technical abilities and creativity he could yet be the man to fill the gaping void left by Luka Modric.

Some of Spurs’ recent signings have verged on the luxury, unnecessary but aesthetically pleasing acquisitions that will thrill with their brief moments of quality. For me the likes of Chadli, Lamela and Paulinho fit into this category; they aren’t the lifeblood of the current side and I would expect Spurs to survive without them.

Keeping hold of Eriksen is different; successful Spurs sides of the past have been founded upon their creative force from the late great John White to the modern day Luka Modric, Spurs fans appreciate their importance. For me Eriksen sits alongside both Vertonghen and Lloris as fundamental components of the so-called ‘project’ at Spurs.

So for the Dane to come out and say all these things is clearly a huge boost regardless of how much you want to read into it. Eriksen was keen to stress the importance of a change of manager, something that has given him a second lease of life at the club:

“Recently I’ve been really satisfied with how it’s gone,” he said.

“I think he (Sherwood) is more English in his style than Villas-Boas of course, you can see that in the way we play. But for me it’s been good, for me personally I’ve had the chance to play, so of course it’s been great.” 

“A win would show everyone that we are top-four contenders, it would show we are still in the race, that’s what we want. If we want to get to the top four we have to win these games, and that’s what we’ll try to do.” 

Even at the age of just 22 it is important to recognise just how crucial Eriksen is. Of course he needs careful managing, but he also needs the stage to showcase his abilities week in week out. Without him in the side Spurs look toothless and unimaginative, with him then they are definitely a side to strike fear into any opposition.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

5th place could spell the end for Tim Sherwood at Spurs; it could also prompt the exits of a number of others. The key for Spurs though is that whatever happens doesn’t derail the overall trajectory as a whole.

It is easy to be cynical about Eriksen’s comments, but for me the show of passion is exactly what Spurs fans need at the moment.  

Click below to watch West Brom vs Man United LIVE!

The 15 ‘greatest footballers’ to have played in the North East

A subjective list of some of the best stars to have played in the North East of England.

This list has foreign stars and local heroes galore, spanning two centuries, many of the players on this list helped the often underachieving area to major trophies.

Current players have been ignored but who knows an updated chart in say five years time, could see Yohan Cabaye, Hatem Ben Arfa and Stephane Sessegnon, joining Peter Beardsley and Alan Shearer as all-time greats, in an area that lives and breathes football.

Please note before butchering me in the comment section for players who have or haven’t made this list, that covering over a century of football across three major teams is no easy feet. Comparing and considering players at Newcastle and Sunderland was also not easy considering both clubs enjoyed the most success in their clubs respective histories over 50 years ago. Also any constructive criticism is welcome, this is by no means a definitive list.

Click on Alan Shearer below to unveil the 15

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[divider]

Babar ton, Jahandad three-for keep Dolphins winless

Stallions’ 174-run win meant that the teams batting first have won all seven games so far in the tournament

ESPNcricinfo staff19-Sep-2024Babar Azam’s unbeaten 104 off 100 balls and Jahandad Khan’s three wickets with the new ball handed Dolphins their third defeat in three games as Stallions registered a mammoth 174-run win in Faisalabad. The result also meant that the teams batting first have won all seven matches so far in the tournament.After Stallions opted to bat, Shan Masood and Yasir Khan gave them a start of 76 in 13 overs. Faheem Ashraf broke the stand with Masood’s wicket and put the brakes on the scoring rate. Yasir, too, fell soon after but Babar played the anchor’s role to perfection. Along with Tayyab Tahir, he added 57 for the third wicket and took the side to 150 in the 30th over.Dolphins used six bowlers in the match and each of them picked up a wicket, but Babar stood firm. At the end of 40 overs, he was on 50 off 65 balls. In the last ten, he smashed 54 off 35, with the help of three fours and three sixes, and lifted Stallions to 271 for 7.If Dolphins thought they would break their duck, Jahandad shattered their hopes quite early into the chase. With the second ball of the innings, he had Muhammad Hurraira caught behind for a duck. In his third over, he trapped Umar Amin lbw to make it 15 for 2.Sahibzada Farhan and Saud Shakeel struck five fours in the next 20 balls but Jahandad struck immediately after that, this time cleaning up Shakeel.Soon after, Haris Rauf dismissed Sarfaraz Ahmed and Qasim Akram in the space of three balls to leave Dolphins gasping for air. From 60 for 5, there was no comeback. The lower middle order surrendered without any resistance against the spin duo of Abrar Ahmed and Mehran Mumtaz. The two shared five wickets as Dolphins folded for 97.

Pujara century puts West Zone in driver's seat; Vyshak takes five to skittle North

On a rain-hit day, West extend lead to 384 despite Saurabh and Jain strikes, while South need 194 runs to beat North

Himanshu Agrawal07-Jul-2023Cheteshwar Pujara hit his 60th first-class century to leave West Zone in a dominating position on the third day of their Duleep Trophy semi-final against Central Zone in Alur. Rain stopped play immediately after he was run-out for 133, with West ending on 292 for 9 – thus, 384 ahead of Central – even as no play was possible after that stoppage.Pujara added crucial partnerships with the middle and lower orders after West were 150 for 4 at one stage, when Saurabh Kumar dismissed Sarfaraz Khan for 6. He shared important stands of 47, 32, 21 and 26 for the fifth, seventh, eighth and ninth wickets, respectively, as the defending champions took one step towards the final. Pujara picked up pace towards the latter stage of his innings after initially taking his time to build his innings, going for his shots with the tail for company.However, Central’s spinners Saurabh and Saransh Jain kept a lid at the other end, sharing seven of the nine wickets to fall between them. In fact, all six wickets went to the duo on the third day, with Saurabh finishing with 4 for 79, and Jain with 3 for 56. After Saurabh had struck first to remove the overnight batter Sarfaraz, Jain grabbed the next three wickets to keep West in check before Saurabh got Chintan Gaja.That continued a sensational Duleep Trophy for Saurabh, who leads the wicket-taking charts with 16. However, his batting team-mates might have to deliver something special even if West were to declare at this stage and set Central 385 to win. And they will be especially wary during the chase after having folded for 128 in the first innings.R Sai Kishore celebrates a wicket with his South Zone team-mates•PTI

Rain spoiled the party in nearby Bengaluru too, leaving the match between South Zone and North Zone tantalisingly poised ahead of the final day’s play. Inclement weather interrupted play after South were 21 without loss in their chase of 215, first forcing an early tea break and then complete abandonment of the evening session. But before that, Vijaykumar Vyshak’s 5 for 76 helped South restrict North to 211 in the second innings, after they were three runs ahead in the first.Vyshak led the way, picking up four of the last seven wickets to fall, as North slid from a comfortable position of 146 for 3. The collapse began when Prabhsimran Singh, on 63, found the fielder at deep square leg while trying to pull a short ball from Vyshak in the 37th over. Two overs later, Sai Kishore dismissed Ankit Kumar, while Vyshak struck twice in the 46th: he first had Jayant Yadav inside edging on to his stumps, and then Pulkit Narang slashing one to slip.Vyshak’s fifth came when Ricky Bhui held on to a good, low catch down the leg side to send Nishant Sindhu back, even as Sai Kishore helped clean the tail up with the last two wickets to fall.Earlier, Prabhsimran played an enterprising knock which contained 11 fours, although North needed help from No. 9 Harshit Rana to boost their score. Rana smashed 38 at better than a run a ball, setting the game up for a final day which could see more rain breaks.

Ashton Agar ruled out of ODI series after testing positive for Covid-19

Australia’s team physio also tests positive on the morning of the opening ODI; rest of the players test negative

Alex Malcolm29-Mar-2022Spinner Ashton Agar has become the second Australia player to test positive for Covid-19 in 24 hours, and has been ruled out of the entire ODI series against Pakistan in Lahore.Cricket Australia (CA) confirmed on Tuesday morning in Pakistan that Agar had tested positive, just 24 hours after Josh Inglis also tested positive. Australia team physiotherapist Brendan Wilson has also tested positive. All other players and staff returned negative tests.Australia will also be without Mitchell Marsh, who suffered a hip flexor injury at training on Monday. Australia have a very limited squad to choose from after Steven Smith was ruled out of the series with an elbow issue.The visitors were planning on playing two spinners in the opening ODI, which opens the door for Mitchell Swepson to possibly make his ODI debut alongside Adam Zampa.Queensland batter Matt Renshaw was flown into Lahore on Monday as extra batting cover but has to complete three days isolation before joining the team.Agar had most recently been a part of Australia’s T20I squad for the home series against Sri Lanka; he played three matches and picked up three wickets at an average of 15.66. Agar has not played an ODI since last July, against West Indies in Bridgetown.The three-match ODI series against Pakistan will be held entirely in Lahore, with the second match on March 31, and third on April 2.

World Test Championship: Must 'go back to the drawing board' – ICC chairman Greg Barclay

“I am not quite sure whether it entirely fits the purpose and has achieved what it intended to”

Press Trust of India30-Nov-2020Greg Barclay, the new ICC chairman, has conceded that the ambitious World Test Championship (WTC) hasn’t quite achieved what it intended to, and the disruption caused by Covid-19 has only highlighted its “shortcomings”. Barclay suggested going “back to the drawing board” after getting the latest – maiden – edition of the competition out of the way.”In short, I don’t think so. Covid has probably highlighted its shortcomings of the championship,” Barclay said during a virtual media conference for wire services on Monday, when asked if the WTC has served its purpose.ALSO READ: WTC finalists to be decided by percentage of points earnedThe WTC schedule was affected in a big way by the pandemic, forcing the ICC to come up with a percentage allocation of points since it wasn’t going to be possible to finish all the scheduled series before the 2021 final at the Lord’s.”… the issues that we have already got, I wonder whether some of it was because of an attempt to develop a Test Championship, clearly designed to drive interest back into Test cricket, provide a bit of context and relevance around the Test matches,” Barclay said.”From an idealist’s point of view, probably it had a lot of merit but practically, I do disagree, I am not sure whether it has achieved what it intended to do.ALSO READ: Kohli – ‘Confusing, very difficult to understand’“My personal view is let’s get through with the little bit that we can in this Covid-19, with reallocation of points and all that […] but once we have done that, let’s go back to the drawing board as I am not quite sure whether it entirely fits the purpose and has achieved what it intended to after being conceptualised four to five years back.”I think we need to look at it in context of calendar and not put cricketers in a situation where it’s a lot worse and not going to help us.”Barclay said that he had the support of some full-member nations on the matter too. “Yeah, I think there would be some countries (who agree with the rethink). It is difficult for some of the full members as they simply can’t afford to play Test cricket,” he said. “Test cricket has got its legacy and I am a purist but I do accept that as much as I want to keep it as it is, less and less countries are able to afford that arrangement and are able to play it.”Very few countries can make it work from a financial point of view.”While Barclay said he believed that T20 leagues would stay, and continue to assist the financial health of the member boards, he wanted bilateral series with context as players’ safety as well as physical and mental health would be paramount in coming days.”My view is that, I think all forms of cricket need to be taken into account,” he said. “You are right, the calendar is increasingly becoming congested and something has to give somewhere.”… but I do respect that each country has the right to develop its own domestic league given it meets the ICC requirements and is properly sanctioned.Greg Barclay at an ICC meeting•Getty Images

“Clearly there is a demand from the playing point of view and commercial partnering perspective. So let’s accept that domestic leagues are here to stay and they have been tremendously contributing to the growth of the really exciting product like the IPL, BBL and CPL.”Context, he reiterated, would be key in keeping bilateral cricket in good health.”It’s an incredibly difficult juggling act to get in there and also, we need to have enough conversations regarding players’ health safety. I don’t think we have had enough conversations,” he said. “Some of the focus needs to be on the integrity aspect of the game and we need to have competitions which are relevant and have context.”When asked about having more global events, which the world body had informally proposed before being rejected by members, Barclay said, “Bilateral cricket is fundamentally important to member countries. ICC runs very, very good events; all countries must have an opportunity to take part in these events.”I am a fan of maintaining ICC events which are world-class, but at the same time, giving an opportunity to members to have bilateral cricket.”On (the lack of) cricket between India and Pakistan, Barclay chose not to get involved, saying it was “not his mandate” and that he understood there were “geo-political” considerations in play, but he did acknowledge the importance of the BCCI to the global game, despite the many ICC vs BCCI incidents over the years: “India is a massively important part of world cricket. Like all families, we have general squabbles but India recognises that ICC needs Indian cricket. We have been able to navigate through differences, if any.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus