Aston Villa aiming to sign a new striker

Aston Villa have shown throughout recent transfer windows that they are very capable of diving into the market and signing players that they need for their squad.

It was reported in March that Steven Gerrard will be looking to complete a significant transfer overhaul this summer, with multiple players possibly moving in and out of the club.

With that in mind, it seems as though a big clue has emerged regarding one part of Villa’s summer plans in the transfer market.

What’s the news?

In a recent report for The Athletic, Villa journalist Gregg Evans shared some insight regarding the club’s aims for the upcoming summer transfer window and their recruitment.

He claimed that “Villa would like a third striker on board”, in addition to signing some defensive reinforcements.

Villa currently have Ollie Watkins and Danny Ings in their squad as their two main senior strikers. The duo have a combined total of 18 goals between them in the Premier League this season, making them Villa’s top two scorers in the league.

However, the Villans currently have an expected goals rate of just 43.7, which is lower than the likes of Brighton & Hove Albion, Southampton and Leeds United.

Villa fans will be buzzing

With that in mind and with Gerrard reportedly looking for another striker to join Villa’s ranks, this suggests that he either isn’t convinced by his current strike duo or just wants to add some extra depth to that area of the squad.

Either way, if Villa are able to sign a top striker this summer who can potentially overtake Watkins or Ings in the pecking order and find the net on a more regular basis, this will surely have lots of the club’s fans buzzing.

On the flip side, the Midlanders have the likes of Keinan Davis and Cameron Archer set to return to Villa Park after recent loan deals.

Should Villa end up buying a new striker during the off-season, this could well impact any chance that Archer and Davis may have at becoming regular first-team figures for Gerrard’s side next term.

Moving forward, it certainly feels as though the possibility of Villa signing a new centre-forward this summer could well have a big impact on a number of different players at the club.

In other news: Gerrard already heading for big summer disaster at AVFC over £13.5m-rated “magician”

'The first six months I didn't enjoy the job much, it was very hard'

Australia coach Justin Langer sits down with ESPNcricinfo to talk about his evolution as a coach, leading the team through a crisis and why this Ashes might be different

Daniel Brettig29-Jul-2019In the middle of the 2009 Ashes series, a few months before he retired from playing and began a decade in coaching for Australia, Western Australia and Perth Scorchers, Justin Langer inadvertently told the world he thought James Anderson could be “a bit of a pussy if he is worn down”.The comment was part of a personal email to Australia’s then coach Tim Nielsen by way of advice on how to tackle England in that year’s five-Test contest. After it was leaked, Langer was the subject of a major story in the , published just as the tourists were trying to recover from a first Test match defeat at Lord’s in 75 years.Looking back on the episode as he reflected on a decade in coaching, Langer says, sitting in the lobby of the Australian team hotel in Birmingham, that it was an early part of his education in public scrutiny – an area in which he has faced unrelenting examination over his first year as Australia’s coach.”One of the boys left the email Tim had printed in the change room at Glamorgan there. It got passed to Steve James, who had been a player at Glamorgan for a long time, who then decided to keep it until it suited him or his newspaper, which was in the [third] Test. And you just learn very quickly that: one, it’s an industry, two, people will twist and turn it however they want, and three, people have got no real concern for who the person is who’s got feelings – they’ll just use it however they want. Good grounding, I guess.”Tim Nielsen said I’d played a lot of cricket in England, I’d played against some of the players, and did I have any thoughts? So it was a pretty innocent question and I just wrote a few words to Tim as a mate and a guy who’d been an assistant coach when I’d been there. It was a personal letter that then got called a dossier. It was a bit like when we took our shoes off at Edgbaston [during the World Cup], all of a sudden they’re calling it ‘earthing’ and all that, all this psychobabble, it was just taking our shoes off because it’s a nice thing to do at a cricket ground.”Much was made of the Anderson comment, but Langer regards it as a measure of both the Englishman and his own evolution as a coach that the same word would not be used again.”Now that was my way of just talking about his body language. When we played against James Anderson as a young man, we felt that if we got on top of him, hit anything loose he bowled, because his body language would drop a little bit. I’d take back the word I used. That wouldn’t be my style now, that’s for sure, but it was two Aussie blokes talking to each other about someone’s body language.”Do I think that now about James Anderson? Absolutely not, and I hope you write this in the article: James Anderson has turned into a brilliant, great English fast bowler. He will be the person we talk about most when we go through our plans for winning this Ashes. When he was a young man he was different, and that happens with most. When I was a young batsman, I was dour, I couldn’t hit the ball off the square, I probably didn’t smile much.Justin Langer looks back at his time with Perth Scorchers and Western Australia as vital to his development as a coach•Getty Images”That was my interpretation of him, having played against him. I didn’t know him at all. That was our experience of his body language as a young player. Would I say that now? No way in the world. He is a great bowler and we respect him enormously, I personally respect him for his longevity, for his skill. The greatest compliment we can give James Anderson now – the same person who wrote that ten years ago, [not] expecting it to get into public hands, certainly wouldn’t say that about him now.”

Learning from rejection

Trial and error, setbacks and achievements have all been a part of Langer’s coaching story, for he has been denied as many coaching roles as he has won. “A lot of people don’t know this: when Mickey Arthur got the job as head coach of Western Australia [in 2010], I applied for that job as well and that was literally straight out of the game,” he says. “I thought, ‘Oh yeah, I’ve got good leadership, I know the game, no worries.’ But then Mickey got the job and I’m glad he did because I had to find some grounding somewhere else, and that was three years working with the Australian team, and I learned a lot of lessons then.”When Mickey got the Australian job, I also applied for that, and I wasn’t ready for that, but I still applied because people kept saying, ‘You’ve got leadership and you know the game, so you should apply for it.’ It was a a really tough experience going through that process. I’m glad I went through it, and I’m also glad I didn’t get the job then, because then I had six years at Western Australia. There’s no way I could’ve done the job I’ve done for 14 months without having that six years’ experience.”It couldn’t have been better grounding. It was all the same issues, all the same problems, just with less scrutiny. I’ve learned how to deal with it and I feel confident to deal with people, game situations, game plans, cricket. But what I had to learn was the scrutiny of the job, and that’s just another part of my evolution as a coach.ALSO READ: Newlands scandal ended reverse swing arms race – Paine“You’re always evolving and learning, and that’s one of the great things about the job. If you don’t, you might as well give up. I’m certainly doing it. The first six months of my job was so hard – I didn’t enjoy the job much.”From detailed deliberations about how to reintegrate Steven Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft to the team after their bans for ball-tampering in Cape Town last year, indifferent results for the ODI and Test teams in their absence, to the many and varied requirements of a new broadcast rights deal that reaped Cricket Australia A$1.18 billion but left the team with many more obligations than previously, Langer was in up to his neck. He was working, too, with a largely inherited support staff, under contract until the end of this year’s Ashes series. But the team’s smiling visage, he insists, was genuine.”I’ve said forever, my whole playing career and my whole coaching career: if they’re relaxed and smiling and enjoying it, they’re going to play better anyway,” he says. “I think they go hand in hand actually.”We’d got smashed and it took great courage, but it was a new group of guys who came in, and they were loving the fact they were playing for their country. You don’t fake it. We had to improve our behaviours a bit, on and off the field, and that was okay, but we were just doing what we thought was the right thing to do.”

Emotional strain

In the wake of a sapping Test series against India, where the Australians did well to be 1-1 going into Boxing Day but then saw things unravel quickly over the final two Tests, Langer was not always pleasant to be around. This was no surprise to those who had seen him grumpy with WA and Scorchers, but the depths to which he was falling with increasing frequency were somewhat oblivious to Langer until he was confronted by the sight of his wife, Sue, in tears over breakfast.”We got to day three or day four of the last Test in Sydney and my family had been over for Boxing Day and for the SCG Test match,” Langer says. “I’ve known my wife since I was 14 years old, so she knows everything about me, and they were leaving. I had to get in the team car to go to the ground at 8.15am. They were leaving that day, and we were at breakfast at 8 o’clock, and my wife started crying at the breakfast table in front of my daughters.Australia coach: a job that requires someone to wear many hats•Getty Images”I said, ‘What’s going on?’ I never see my wife cry – we know everything about each other. She said, ‘I just don’t like what’s happening here. I don’t like what it’s doing to you, I don’t like what it’s doing to us. People are so mean – what people are saying about you and the team and Australian cricket’. That was a real eye-opener for me, that it was affecting my family.”Others saw signs too. Among them was Malcolm Conn, formerly an award-winning cricket journalist and now the communications manager for Cricket New South Wales, who saw Langer’s testy back and forth with the ‘s Tom Decent over the issue of Glenn Maxwell and how he had been given undertakings regarding CA’s plans for him in the winter of 2018, which turned out to be unfounded.”I got, I’d say, two-out-of-ten grumpy with the journalist in Sydney, and I was also amazed at the backlash of that as well,” Langer says. “I apologised straight after the event, but I realised [from] the way people said, ‘He’s getting angry, he’s losing it.’ I didn’t feel that but my wife was getting upset – that was a real moment.”I’ve said privately and publicly a few times if I look back to my career: 1993 when I got dropped for the first time – really tough time, but pivotal in my life. I got dropped in 2001 – really, really tough time, but pivotal in my life. I look to January 2019 in Sydney – really tough time, but I’ve got no doubt it’ll be a massive part of my evolution as a coach. I got a really nice email from Malcolm Conn, just after that press conference. He gave me some really good advice. He knows what it was, but when I’m getting that sort of feedback from my wife, that sort of feedback from the team, I knew I had to find ways to get better, and hopefully I’ve done that.”

Respect for Trevor Bayliss

Langer takes inspiration from, among others, England’s coach Trevor Bayliss. Famed for his ability to keep calm at even the moments of greatest strain for the teams he has coached, Bayliss left a vivid memory in Langer’s mind when they crossed paths in Dubai in 2009. Langer was on his way to England; Bayliss, coach of Sri Lanka at the time, was on his way back home from Lahore, where the Sri Lanka and ICC officials team buses were machine-gunned in a terrorist attack.”I just remember his calmness. I’ve got a lot of respect for him. He’s just won the World Cup, he’s done some really good things in cricket.”It’s great to see someone like him, who’s gone right through the ranks to now be a World Cup-winning coach, I think that’s brilliant. He’s a great, shining light for coaching. We always get along very well, and I really like the journey he’s taken. [The World Cup win is] a feather in his cap and a reward for the hard work he’s done over many years, and it helps to elevate coaching. I think coaching in cricket is really immature, if you think about the other codes.”Just how far Langer’s own coaching has been elevated with time will be demonstrated by how Australia tackle the task of winning an Ashes series in England for the first time since 2001. Ask him to ruminate on how the team led by Mark Taylor was able to overcome a 0-1 deficit and the captain’s own form slump to win 3-2 in 1997, but the 2005 team could not, despite its bevy of great players, and it is patently clear the result still grates.”Our team then was a great team and no one can ever deny that. But some things happened, didn’t they?” he says. “Glenn stepped on the ball. I’ll say it until I die – you take the best players out of your team in any sport, it’s going to have an impact, and it did. McGrath’s on top of his game – he got his 500th wicket the game before – he’s bowling beautifully to Marcus Trescothick. You take him out, a few of the players for the first time are struggling a little bit with form.”It was a great series, a real arm-wrestle. The same team fought back two years later and won 5-0. It was an unusual tour that, 2005, and we’ll take stuff from it this year. But we’re certainly not the team we were in 2005. That was literally a great cricket team, probably seven or eight all-time greats, a couple of very good players. I was a good player and we had some all-time great players.Steven Smith, Justin Langer and David Warner during the Australia World Cup squad’s trip to Gallipoli•Cricket Australia”This is different. We’ve got a couple of great players this time, we’ve got a couple of aspiring great players, some very good players, and we’ve got some kids learning the ropes. Very different to compare this team to 2005, 1997, 1993 or 1989.”

Secret to Ashes success?

In an Ashes squad of 17, Langer and the selection chairman Trevor Hohns have assembled a group with more than a few players who offer gritty, fighting qualities, but also plenty of experience playing the game in this part of the world.”The vision early on to have us playing some Australia A cricket and those three red-ball games, hopefully that will give us a kick-start into the Ashes,” Langer says. “The fact we kept players like Marnus Labuschagne, Cameron Bancroft and Peter Siddle playing county cricket – so, as many Australian players playing red-ball cricket as possible – that was all part of the planning for it.”Equally England will have some players who have played some red-ball cricket as well. We’ve got eight guys, I think, who’ve just been solely focused on red-ball cricket for the last few months, and plus the one game the other day.”One of the most intriguing choices was Bancroft, who comes back into the fold at the same time as Smith and Warner. Langer and Bancroft have enjoyed a close relationship as batsman and mentor for years in WA, but Langer is adamant that sentiment had nothing at all to do with the 26-year-old’s presence in the squad. Indeed, he points out that Bancroft’s county stint with Durham was perhaps even more valuable than most.”Selection is about performance isn’t it? He, like David and Steve Smith, they’ve paid a very heavy penalty,” Langer says. “He came to Durham and he’s got to bat first on a really tough Durham wicket, because there’s no tosses over here. I remember talking to Marcus North weeks ago about it, and he said, it’s a very tough wicket up there, and he’s averaged 40-odd, got a couple of hundreds.ALSO READ: ‘I wasn’t as true to myself as I could have been’ – Bancroft battles back“Then he batted in a two-and-a-half-day game, and you’d have to say he was the standout batsman, just with true grit. I think to win over here we’re going to need batters who are really mentally strong, who’ve got a sound technique, who make runs. What he does is if he gets in, he usually gets hundreds. He likes to bat, to wear them down. He’s also a brilliant fieldsman – if he plays he’ll be a very good bat-pad to Nathan Lyon. He is a great slips fielder, which is important in English conditions, just a really good package.”He’s earned it on performance – a bloke who averages 56 in Shield cricket and averages 40-odd opening the batting in tough conditions in Durham and then plays like that [in Southampton]. He’s been selected on performance. When he came out of it he was the leading run scorer [for Australia] in South Africa in that [2018] Test series, so he can obviously play as well. There’s no sentiment there. We thought there were some tough selections, no doubt about that, but we felt he is in good form and he warrants selection through his performances.”How will Langer’s Australia respond to the question he once posed of James Anderson? For they are not only going to be facing a concerted challenge from England on the pitch but a strident campaign of criticism, abuse and booing from beyond the boundary. They know, more or less, what to expect, but they still need to cope with the challenge of fronting up to it day upon day for 25 days across five Tests. Resilience will be required – by the bucketload.”We’ve had a pretty good snapshot of what to expect from the crowds here in England,” Langer says. “We respect if that’s how they want to react, that’s fine – there’s nothing we can do about it. Our boys were brilliant throughout the World Cup, and I expect them to be brilliant dealing with it throughout the Ashes as well. I know it’s going to be tough on them. We’ll just get on with the job and play the best cricket we can.”That’s why it’s called Test cricket. It’s tough. That’s why we love the game so much. Physically, mentally, technically, you’ve got to be really strong. We talk about mental toughness, having a great technique. Bowlers have to have the physical endurance, batsmen have to have concentration. It’s a game of resilience, it’s like a marathon, and our blokes will be up for it. It’s the toughest part of the game.”

How Malinga's slower dippers sucker-punched Bangladesh

Double-strikes, double-drops, and triple-strikes feature in the plays of the day from the second T20I between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh at the Khettarama

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Colombo06-Apr-2017The slower-ball salvo
Lasith Malinga is the only bowler to have claimed three ODI hat-tricks. So, perhaps, it is only fitting he should have one in the format for which he is most famed. It has been a while since he was at his fastest, or his fittest, but what he lacked for firepower, he made up for in wiles. Mushfiqur Rahim was first to be dismissed – bowled by an offcutter that evaded his slog sweep and shaved off stump. Mashrafe Mortaza was also bowled by a delivery that dived on him. Having watched Malinga bowl four slower balls in succession now, debutant Mehedi Hasan perhaps expected the quick one, but was done in by another slow dipper – the ball hitting him on the pads in front of the stumps. When the umpire raised his finger, Khettarama broke into raptures.The fumble
Mashrafe had largely had an unremarkable final match and in the 14th over missed the chance to shut the door on a struggling Sri Lanka. Chamara Kapugedara had hit the ball to fine leg, taken the first run quickly and was halfway down the pitch for the second, when Seekkuge Prasanna sent him back. Mushfiqur collected the return throw and attempted to relay the ball to Mashrafe at the non-striker’s end, but though Mashrafe was in position, and the throw came in adjacent to the stumps, Mashrafe leaned over the wickets and attempted to take the ball in front of the stumps and fumbled it. Kapugedara was allowed to live on – if only for a few more overs.The first-up double-strike
Mustafizur Rahman has turned many a match for Bangladesh in the past two years, and he bowled a definitive over again in this match, claiming two wickets off his first two balls off the evening. The first one was angled across Asela Gunaratne, and though the batsman struck the ball well, he hit it straight to the cover fielder, at throat height. The next ball was slightly overpitched again, but this time to left-hander Milinda Siriwardana. He ventured a square drive, but picked out point.The double-drop
Having largely fielded well in the last two matches, the drops returned to Sri Lanka’s cricket on Thursday. Both of these chances were tough, but they would be telling. Shakib Al Hasan was on four off five balls when he slammed Seekkuge Prasanna towards deep square leg, only for Vikum Sanjaya to fail to hold on to a difficult running catch. Two balls later, he top-edged another one towards deep midwicket, which the advancing Dilshan Munaweera failed to cling to. Shakib would go on to top-score for Bangladesh with 38 off 31 balls.

India's first bilateral ODI series in Australia

A stats preview of the five-match ODI series between India and Australia

Bharath Seervi11-Jan-20160 Number of bilateral ODI series between India and Australia in Australia. All the ODIs played by India in Australia have been part of series or tournaments of three or more teams only.10-31 India’s win-loss record in ODIs against Australia in Australia, which includes a streak of 11 consecutive losses against the hosts ending in 2004. In their last 11 complete ODIs, India have won four matches which include the two finals of the Commonwealth Bank Series of 2007-08. India’s win-loss ratio of 0.363 against Australia in Australia in ODIs since 2000 is their second worst against host countries.14 Consecutive ODIs without defeat for Australia at home since November 2014. Their last defeat was to South Africa at the WACA on November 16, 2014.3 Bilateral ODI series defeats for Australia at home in 17 series’ since 2000. Their losses came against: Pakistan (1-2) in 2002, South Africa (1-4) in 2008-09 and Sri Lanka (1-2) in 2010-11.They have won ten series’ and four have been drawn.1 Centuries by India batsmen against Australia in Australia in the last eight ODIs, since 2008. The only hundred was by Rohit Sharma, who made 138 at the MCG in January 2015. However, there were three hundreds in six matches by India batsmen in the 2015 World Cup at Australian venues.57.06 Rohit Sharma’s average against Australia in ODIs, his best against any Test-playing team. He has scored three centuries against them: 209, 141* and 138. Sri Lanka are the only other team against whom he has made two centuries in ODIs.169 Runs required by Virat Kohli to complete 7000 ODI runs. If he gets there in this five-match series, he will become the quickest to the landmark beating AB de Villiers who did it in 166 innings. Kohli has 6831 runs in 158 innings.135 Runs needed by Aaron Finch in two innings to become the joint-fastest Australia batsman to 2000 ODI runs. He has 1865 runs in 50 innings. Currently, the fastest Australia batsman to 2000 ODI runs is David Boon, who took 52 innings to reach the mark. Finch averages 45.87 against India in eight innings with four half-centuries and a best of 96.

Follow-on resistance, and Karunaratne's highest

Stats highlights from the third day of the first Test between Sri Lanka and New Zealand in Christchurch

Bishen Jeswant28-Dec-2014Most runs in a calendar year |Create infographics152 Dimuth Karunaratne’s score, the highest by a Sri Lankan batsman when following on. It’s the fifth best by a Sri Lankan opener in Tests outside Asia and Zimbabwe, and the highest in the second innings in these matches.7 The number of Sri Lankan batsmen who have scored hundreds when the team has followed on. Two of the previous six helped draw the game: Sanjeeva Ranatunga’s 100 not out saved the Test against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo in 1994, while Mahela Jayawardene’s 119 saved the Test against England at Lord’s in 2006. The only other opener among these seven is Russel Arnold, against England at Old Trafford in 2002.3 The number of Sri Lankan openers with hundreds in New Zealand. The two others are Marvan Atapattu in Napier in 2005, and Asanka Gurusinha in Dunedin in 1995. Both were dismissed for 127.85 Karunaratne’s previous highest Test score, against Australia in Sydney last year.125 Overs that Sri Lanka have played in their second innings, which is already their second best in the 19 matches when they have followed on. Their highest is 199 overs, against England at Lord’s in 2006.2813* Runs scored by Kumar Sangakkara across formats in 2014 (only matches that started in 2014), the second most in a year after the 2833 that Ricky Ponting scored in 2005. Sangakkara needed 28 runs in this Test to go past Ponting’s record, but managed only 1 and 6 in his two innings. Sangakkara has been dismissed in both innings of a Test for 28 runs or fewer only 10 times in his 129 Test career.28 Runs scored by Sangakkara in his last five Test innings against New Zealand. His scores read 5, 0, 16, 6 and 1. In his last five innings against other teams, Sangakkara has scored 395 runs, with scores of 72, 221, 21, 22 and 59.4 Number of Sri Lankan batsman who have followed up a first-innings duck with a second-innings hundred. Apart from Karunaratne, who achieved this in the current Test, Mahela Jayawardene, Aravinda de Silva and Sangakkara are the other Sri Lankans to do this. In all, ten Sri Lankans have scored a century and a duck in the same Test.4 The number of New Zealand bowlers who have taken 30-plus Test wickets in successive calendar years. Trent Boult has done this in 2013 and 2014. The other New Zealand bowlers to achieve this are Iain O’Brien, Richard Hadlee and Chris Martin.

Kids having banana fights in the back seat

In which we find out what the England team have been reduced to

Andy Zaltzman25-Feb-2013There was always a likelihood that the potentially fascinating England v South Africa Test series would be overshadowed by events off the pitch. Most assumed those events would have involved Olympian athletes running very fast, champion cyclists pedalling as frantically as a newspaper boy being chased by a rocket-propelled Alsatian, the British sport-watching public suddenly remembering about rowing for a few days, and the tragic reunion of the Spice Girls (the alleged musical act who temporarily escaped from captivity for the closing ceremony before being apprehended, tranquilised and returned to their secret underground vault). And indeed, the Olympics duly enraptured the nation’s sporting attention as they proved to be a magnificent success for Britain, on and off the track/lake/banked-track/ road/sea/pool/court/pitch/range/ pretend-mountain-river/mat/ring/horsiedrome.It would, therefore, have been preferable for the Test matches not to have been also overshadowed by the dispiriting bicker and counter-bicker of Kevin Pietersen’s ongoing battle with 21st-century communications technology, his employers, his team-mates and, above all, himself. It has been a game of squabble tennis that must have had the egg and bacon of the MCC members’ ties frying each other in annoyance, although it does make you wonder how differently Bodyline might have panned out if Don Bradman had had access to Twitter.Pietersen and his errant mobile will be absent from the Lord’s Test, which is, respectively, bad and good news for cricket fans. When Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone, before excitedly ringing himself up to congratulate himself on his achievement, he cannot possibly have imagined that his well-meaning communications device would one day prove so damaging to English cricket. Hopefully the mysterious “advisors” who have apparently been directing Pietersen will take the opportunity of their man’s absence from the Test to read a book entitled .Somewhere in the midsts of all this, what had formerly been a long-awaited Test series is taking place, in which Pietersen has displayed the full extent of his cricketing talent to haul England back towards the parity that most had predicted before the series began. He had even started to resemble the useful offspinner that South Africa had once hoped he might prove to be.Perhaps the continuing after-grumble of this avoidable dispute will serve to unify the England team and spur them into an improved performance. If it does, they may win at Lord’s. Or they may still lose, or draw. South Africa will be desperate not to fumble a series lead for the fifth time this decade. They have not lost at Lord’s since 1960, and have been bowled out twice in only three of their last 14 Tests against England, but they have lost all four previous final Tests they have played in England since readmission.The home team’s task would have been easier with Pietersen, who, without ever finding a consistency of scoring, which may be impossible with his technique (and, perhaps, temperament), has played major, series-shaping innings four times in the last two years – double-centuries against Australia and India to facilitate England’s first victories of those ultimately triumphant series, an incendiary 151 in Galle to transform a slow match and a disastrous winter, and his recent Headingley masterpiece, which significantly shifted the momentum of the current contest.This is not to suggest that England should have picked him for Lord’s. Without knowing, or caring, about the specifics of this disappointing shebang, it seems that Pietersen has been, to put it charitably, behaviourally erratic. When a team voluntarily leaves out its most dangerous batsman, it is fair to assume they have good cause to do so (unless that team is West Indies, in which case it is fair to assume nothing) (or unless that team is not a cricket team, in which case it is probably a reasonable selectorial call).However, if Pietersen has unquestionably shot himself in the foot, his podiatrist will be removing a selection of different bullets fired from varying angles and from more than one gun. The episode is an embarrassment for the entire England set-up, about as edifying as a food-fight in a famine, and an individual and collective failure in an era that has been predominantly marked by individual and collective successes. Captain Strauss, who has conducted himself with characteristic care and dignity, has exuded the air of a parent trying to remain calmly focused on driving whilst his children are noisily smearing bananas in each other’s faces in the back seat of the car. That those children are in their 20s and 30s must add to his frustration. There will be some interesting chapters in autobiographies over the next few years.It is a hugely important match for England, and only partially because of the battle to retain their position at the top of the world rankings, which is of tangential relevance and dependent on the ICC’s chosen bits of mathematics as much as results. If the team that had such a rampant 2011 was to lose its second series of 2012, whilst in a state of infantile internecine conflict, it would suggest a team in significant decline. Or, at least, a team returning to the level it had occupied before its spectacular peak, but in a worse mood for having scaled the mountain, before inadvertently slipping over whilst plonking its flag on the summit, and sliding on its backside down to base camp before it had taken all the photographs it wanted to.England’s successes were founded on ceaselessly effective team bowling performances, but the squad of bowlers who had recorded such phenomenal statistics and earned fully merited praise from 2010 until this summer are now facing a defining match. Tim Bresnan, who had mixed reliability with insistent probing and regular wickets, has been unpenetrative and expensive against South Africa, and has had only one effective Test out of five this season. Stuart Broad has been inconsistent – 11 for 165 against West Indies at Lord’s at the start of the summer, 8 for 111 from the moment he dismissed AB de Villiers at Headingley, 3 for 311 in the two-and-a-bit Tests in between. Graeme Swann was dropped for the first time in his previously slump-free four-year Test career, after only six wickets in four Tests (Pietersen dismissed more top-order batsmen at Headingley than Swann had in the first four Tests of the summer).James Anderson, England’s most important bowler, who had taken at least two first-innings wickets in 18 consecutive Tests since the start of the 2010-11 Ashes, took only one very expensive one at the Oval, and picked up his second in the Leeds first innings only by dismissing the South African No. 11, Imran Tahir. He was not helped by some sub-shoddy catching, and maintained impressive control, but England need his new-ball penetration restored at Lord’s.Aside from those four core bowlers, Steven Finn has not played consecutive Tests since being dropped after the Perth Test in December 2010, and has dismissed only one top-order batsman in his two Tests this summer, and the injury-ravaged Chris Tremlett took 1 for 82 in his only Championship appearance of the year. It was an attack that showed almost no weakness for 18 months, even in defeat. Now, all of them are struggling for their best. They have all proved themselves previously. They must do so again. Against a batting line-up containing four of the top six batsmen in the current rankings. And a man who has just scored 182 in the preceding Test. Before its own batsmen, featuring two novices against three of the world’s top-seven-ranked seam bowlers, try to convert their wickets into victory. Strauss’ England are facing their greatest challenges, on and off the pitch/press-conference/dressing-room/ internet/mobile.These two teams will not meet again in Tests until the 2015-16 season, by which time they will have played three Tests against each other in almost six years, a scheduling blooper of significant proportions in an era crying out desperately for competitive Test cricket. That this rare and annoyingly brief encounter of sides containing several of the world’s foremost cricketers, who have generally produced closely fought and captivating series, has been scarred by a playground-level spat that has cost the climactic showdown its most compelling protagonist, is a source of considerable regret.Confectionery Stall prediction: South Africa to win.Player to watch: AB de Villiers. A pair of 40s at Leeds suggested that a major contribution could be imminent from a player who can make a cricket ball swoon and ask for his autograph in gratitude for having been hit so purely to the boundary.

Barath falls for the trap

Plays of the Day from the third day of the first Test between India and West Indies at Sabina Park

Sriram Veera at Sabina Park23-Jun-2011The conversation of the day
Rahul Dravid was on 95. Fifteen years ago, to the date, he was out on the same score on debut. Amit Mishra, who had given him admirable support, suddenly went for a big slog against Ravi Rampaul and failed to connect. Dravid rushed down the track for a chat. A couple of overs later, Dravid, on 97, went for a hook and the ball climbed over the blade. This time Mishra came down the track for a chat. Wonder what he said.Frenetic action of the day
Ishant Sharma troubled Adrian Barath in the first innings with the bounce he extracted from short of a length. Barath decided to counterattack in the second innings. He pulled a bouncer over long-leg, square drove over gully and top-edged a hook over the fine-leg boundary.Adrenaline rush of the day
Barath had just edged a delivery from Praveen Kumar through the unmanned third slip region. A ball later, MS Dhoni moved a man in there. Surely, Barath was not going to fall for it? Wrong. He did. He chased a slightly wider delivery and flashed it to third slip where Suresh Raina held a good catch.Deja-vu feeling of the day
Praveen was warned thrice for running on the danger area and couldn’t bowl any more in the first innings. “It’s good that it happened in the first innings of my first Test,” Praveen said at the end of the second day. He did it again on the third day. Again, it was the same umpire Ian Gould who caught his transgression and gave him the first warning. Two strikes to go.

The drugs don't work

A review of Paul Smith’s autobiography,

Will Luke27-May-2007Wasted? by Paul Smith (Know the Score), 240pp, £11.20

Paul Smith had a bit of rock-n-roll about him. The long hair, the long run-up, the extravagant follow-through and the swashbuckling strokeplay, his cricket was energetic and unorthodox. But his is a sad story: one of regret, disappointment, depression and turmoil. Even homelessness. is a rare insight into the trappings of fame, the inadequacies of the authority’s handling of drugs – but moreover one man’s mission to transform his life.It was in 1997 that Smith was banned by the ECB for his use of “recreational” drugs: a fair cocktail of cannabis, cocaine and speed. But in the early chapters of his book, he goes at great length to tell of the double standards that he felt he fell victim to. He was not alone in being a user: there were, Smith says, other high-profile county and Test cricketers in England regularly taking recreational drugs. The ECB’s policy was, in Smith’s eyes at least, entirely inconsistent. The ban ruined him, his life turned upside down, emotionally and financially. Drugs were the treat afforded to him by his success for Warwickshire, yet they ruined him. Although acutely aware of how the effect they had, and although he now wants to prevent others falling into the same trap, the anger he feels at the authorities and some former colleagues and friends is clear and painful.And to that end, there is a strong sense of victimisation that pervades much of the book. Other players – Shane Warne, Keith Piper, Dermot Reeve to name but three – have since suffered similar fates, but none to the extent Smith feels he had to endure. It isn’t all about the drugs though: Smith’s tumultuous personal life receives extensive dissection too, and it is no less chaotic. His very good friend, Piper, had a four-year long affair with Smith’s partner, the mother of his five-year-old daughter. Given the messiness of the subsequent break-up, Smith was denied custody.

Smith tearing into bowl for Warwickshire in 1988 © Getty Images
Even now, in 2007, he hasn’t seen or heard from his daughter in two years and doesn’t even know where she lives. And in fact, it is this constant reflection of the past and comparison to his present life now which makes this book so different. So often, autobiographies are gushingly sentimental, reminiscing about past glories with rose-tinted spectacles. Smith is understandably misty-eyed – a factor not helped by the drugs, of course – but there is a refreshing honesty to his words.The prose and flow become a little disjointed though, which makes for a bumpy but stimulating ride through the 204 pages. He lurches from the 1980s to the 2000s to the 1990s and back again, citing an anecdote here and a flashback there. Much like in his playing days, there isn’t much rhythm or predictability, but it’s always entertaining. It is almost like reading his diary or a notebook, not an autobiography, such are the frequency of quirky anecdotes and yarns.Besides his rocky relationships, perhaps the most interesting section of the book is the time he spent in America. Financially ruined and often homeless, he went for days without meals and in the process met a kaleidoscope of different people. And it was in here, in Los Angeles, that he forged to turn around his life and put his experiences to good use. Cricket Without Boundaries was formed, a scheme to divert wayward kids from the dangers of guns, drugs and crime into something meaningful; using the spirit and tradition of cricket to teach them a new way of thinking.It seems to be working for the kids, but also for Smith. If anything, this venture might act as Smith’s strongest (and most addictive) substance yet. is far from a conventional read but, written by one of cricket’s more avant-garde characters, nothing less should be expected.

VIDEO: Ugly scenes as Chelsea & Real Betis fans involved in violent clashes ahead of Conference League final in Wroclaw – with police resorting to using pepper spray

Chelsea and Real Betis fans have clashed ahead of the Conference League final on Wednesday, with Polish police intervening with tear gas.

Article continues below

Article continues below

Article continues below

  • Polish police break up Chelsea and Betis fans
  • Tear gas used
  • Fans threw chairs at each other
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Supporters of the two sides have been filmed in violent clashes ahead of the Conference League final in Wroclaw. Polish police were forced to intervene as chairs and other objects were thrown outside bars. There are said to have been scuffles prior to the police's involvement, given the increased presence of the authorities on the ground due to the game. They eventually resorted to using pepper spray.

  • Advertisement

  • WATCH THE CLIP

  • WHAT POLICE SAID

    A statement from the Provincial Police Headquarters in the city read: "The uniformed officers reacted immediately after the incident, which resulted in no further escalation of the conflict or negative behavior.

    "The fans scattered in different directions and currently the police officers of the criminal division are conducting activities aimed at identifying them.

    "The number of preventive and operational police forces and their saturation is so large in places where residents and sports fans gather or move around that everyone can feel safe. 

    "Please immediately notify the nearby Police or City Guard patrol of any incident, or call the emergency number 112. We are at your disposal and our priority is to ensure safety – says Senior Warrant Officer Łukasz Dutkowiak.

    "Foot patrols, monitoring from drones and helicopters, intensified activities on the streets and in key locations – the office enumerates and adds: – Firefighters from the Municipal Headquarters of the State Fire Service in Wrocław and rescuers are also ready to respond immediately, especially in the area of the stadium and all fan zones."

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images

    WHAT NEXT?

    Chelsea and Betis face off on Wednesday. The Blues finished fourth in the Premier League, while Betis finished sixth in La Liga.

Real Madrid player ratings vs Real Oviedo: Magical Kylian Mbappe carries Blancos again before Vinicius Jr shows rusty Rodrygo how it's done with late show

Xabi Alonso's side weren't particularly impressive on Sunday but still secured their second La Liga win in a row to open the season

Kylian Mbappe scored twice before Vinicius Jr added a third to secure a 3-0 victory for an otherwise underwheliming Real Madrid over newly-promoted Real Oviedo. Xabi Alonso's side produced an unconvincing performance for the second straight game, but leaned on their star attackers to provide enough moments of quality to win. 

Madrid almost conceded within seconds as an Oviedo foray forward drew a mistake out of Thibaut Courtois, but the excellent Dean Huijsen recovered well. Los Blancos were otherwise on the front foot throughout, even if they created few opportunities, and they scored from their one real chance of the first half when Mbappe swivelled around his man on the edge of the box and finished wonderfully into the bottom corner.

Federico Valverde could have made it two in the second half when he found himself on the receiving end of a finely-worked counter, but goalkeeper Aaron Escandell saved at full stretch. Oviedo, meanwhile, had their chances as the half wore on and hit the post shortly before Mbappe ruthlessly stroked the ball into the bottom corner after a pass from Vinicius with seven minutes remaining.

Vinicius then added some gloss to the scoreline in stoppage time as he found the bottom corner after Oviedo committed too many men forward as Alonso's side made it two wins from two to start their La Liga season.

GOAL rates Madrid's players from Estadio Carlos Tartiere…

GettyGoalkeeper & Defence

Thibaut Courtois (6/10):

Almost made to look very silly by an early Oviedo attack, but bailed out by his defence. Dealt with a couple of easy saves before producing one full-stretch stop late on. 

Dani Carvajal (6/10):

Made his first La Liga start since sustaining a serious knee injury nearly a year ago. Solid as he gets more minutes in. 

Antonio Rudiger (5/10):

Given real trouble by Rondon, and was far more comfortable when the veteran striker was replaced. 

Dean Huijsen (8/10):

An excellent performance. Impervious at the back, up for the fight, and good with the ball.

Alvaro Carreras (6/10):

Helped move the ball, got into some good areas, and kept his side of the pitch relatively steady. 

AdvertisementGettyMidfield

Aurelien Tchouameni (7/10):

Kept in the XI while a few others changed. Controlled space effectively, moved the ball well and won a key challenge in the run up to Madrid's opener. 

Federico Valverde (7/10):

Showed a bit more positional discipline. Almost grabbed himself a goal, only to be well denied.  

Arda Guler (8/10):

Played some clever passes and almost set up a lovely goal in the first half before producing the assist for Mbappe. 

GettyAttack

Franco Mastantuono (6/10):

Had some nice touches off the right, created a couple of chances, but didn't offer the kind of width Madrid needed.

Kylian Mbappe (8/10):

Scored a wonderful goal after an otherwise ineffective first half. Did the same again after the break. Didn't really have any other chances, but hard to knock him for being the match-winner. 

Rodrygo (5/10):

Started on the left (finally), but was largely ineffective. If Madrid were hoping to add a few million to his price tag, they failed.

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

GettySubs & Manager

Brahim Diaz (6/10):

Lively in a midfield role. Forced a couple of key turnovers. 

Vinicius Jr (7/10):

Booked for diving but provided a delightful assist for Mbappe before scoring one of his own.

Gonzalo Garcia (N/A):

Ran tirelessly, but had relatively few chances to make an impact otherwise.

Dani Ceballos (N/A):

No time to make an impact. 

Trent Alexander-Arnold (N/A):

No time to make an impact. 

Xabi Alonso (7/10):

Made some changes, including leaving Alexander-Arnold and Vinicius on the bench. They worked for the most part, with Madrid scoring three good goals and looking mostly in control. Two games, two wins. 

Game
Register
Service
Bonus