Confident Root shows early shoots of a bountiful reign

These are early days in the reign of Root, but the signs are already promising. George Dobell runs the rule over his first three days in charge

George Dobell at Lord's08-Jul-2017Selection

This was very much Joe Root’s squad. While it is understood others on the selection panel had differing views in some areas, Root had the confidence to argue for the team he wanted and, after discussion, was backed by the other selectors. Both factors bode well. The decision to play two spinners at Lord’s – the first time England had done so at the ground since 1993 – was a surprise. But with the pair of them combining to claim six wickets in South Africa’s first innings – only the second time this century England’s spinners had taken six wickets in the first innings of a home Test – it was a move that was largely vindicated. The selection of Gary Ballance – especially at No. 3 – remains a little contentious, but he looked secure enough on the third evening and has allowed Root to slip back down to his preferred No. 4 position.Personal performance

By making a century in his first innings as England captain – not just a century, but the highest score by an England captain in their first innings in the role – Root snuffed out any immediate doubts there may have been about the burden of leadership compromising his run-scoring ability. He had some luck early in the innings – he was dropped on 16 – but he also exhibited a nice mixture of patience and positivity to help his side recover from a potentially precarious position to build an imposing one. In doing so, he not only led by example in terms of results, but in terms of showing how he wants his team to play.Review use

Root has so far utilised the DRS twice in the field. While the first appeal – Mark Wood’s lbw shout against Theunis de Bruyn – was declined, it was only done so on an umpire’s call basis. So while England lost one of their reviews, they will not do so in similar circumstances when the new playing regulations are introduced later in the year. The second review – the lbw shout against Keshav Maharaj – turned out to be excellently judged. While Maharaj was well down the pitch and had lunged with a mixture of bat and pad, Root reasoned – and it did appear to be Root who was insistent about using the review – that the ball had struck the pad first and that reviews would prove the ball was going on straight on to hit the stumps. He proved less prophetic when suggesting Ballance review his first-innings dismissal but, in the field at least, he proved astute and decisive.Tactics

Root has started impressively here. Despite very little captaincy experience, he has looked both calm and dynamic. Jimmy Anderson praised his use of the bowlers in South Africa’s first innings, crediting him with using them in short spells to ensure they remained fresh despite the warm weather. He also praised him for the slightly unusual fielding positions – short mid-on and mid-offs, for example – that eventually resulted in the wicket of Quinton de Kock. Recognising the slowing pace of the pitch, Root placed a man just in front of squad on the off side and he eventually took the catch that ended a dangerous innings.Joe Root rings the changes on his first day in the field as Test captain•Getty Images”That was very good field placing,” Anderson said. “And it was all Joe’s idea.” There were some other notable moments: bowling Liam Dawson after lunch on day three was a surprise, but he quickly justified it with the wicket of Maharaj, while the decision to take a bit of pressure off Moeen Ali – both as batsman and bowler – and encourage him to be aggressive appears to have worked well. But Root’s willingness not to contrive funkiness was also welcome: England’s batting on the third evening – when they scored 119 in 51 overs – was fashion-defyingly obdurate. It was justified, though, as it all but batted South Africa out of the game and was made in the face of some good, sustained bowling. Imaginative when required and persistent when necessary, this has been a remarkably assured start from an unexperienced captain.Demeanour

Root has seemed impressively unaltered by the responsibilities of captaincy. Despite suffering from a cold, he has remained open and friendly in his media appearances – an important factor for a sport that probably needs to reengage with a section of society that may have been wearied by more cynical England teams – and both relaxed yet focused on the pitch. So while he was able to laugh off the four over-throws conceded by Stuart Broad on the second day, he tinkered with his field regularly to reflect the changing patterns of the game and didn’t seem to rely too heavily on any of his senior players for advice or support. He looked, in short, as if he had every confidence in his ability and as if he belonged in the role.Luck

Richie Benaud famously said that captaincy was “90 percent luck and 10 percent skill” and the early signs – the very early signs – are that Root might just have that little bit of fortune he will require. Certainly he is fortunate to have a side with such all-round depth – you could argue that the success of both Mike Brearley and Michael Vaughan was predicated on the presence of top-quality allrounders within their side – and such experienced campaigners as Anderson, Broad and Alastair Cook. Here he also benefited from winning an important toss and a couple of missed chances early in his innings. As Benaud also said, though, “but don’t try it without that 10 percent” of skill. Those early signs – those very early signs – suggest Root may have both.

Wobblyline, shoddyline, bulge-gate: Twitter reacts to Moeen's close stumping

Moeen Ali was stumped by the finest of margins at the Gabba, and not everyone agreed with the third umpire’s decision

ESPNcricinfo staff26-Nov-2017

Not all seemed right with the line, on closer inspection.

Duly enough, deliverance seemed to arrive, albeit a few minutes late for Moeen.

New names started doing the rounds.

One more was added to the gate-suffixed nomenclature.

As with all such debates, there was a point of view from the other side too. Was there any benefit of doubt to be given at all?

At the end of the day’s play, Moeen himself wasn’t too fussed about the decision.

Sri Lanka suffer 12th straight defeat

All the statistical peaks Pakistan scaled and the statistical troughs Sri Lanka plumbed during the fifth ODI in Sharjah

Bharath Seervi23-Oct-2017Playing just his second ODI, Usman Khan destroyed Sri Lanka’s top-order, striking four times in 11 balls and then completing a five-for off his 21st delivery. Since 2001, only two bowlers have completed a five-wicket haul in fewer balls. Chaminda Vaas did it in 16 balls against Bangladesh in Pietermeritzburg in the 2003 World Cup, which included a hat-trick from the first three balls of the innings, and Netherlands’ Timm van der Gugten completed a five-for in 20 balls against Canada in 2013. Usman is only the second Pakistan bowler after Bilal Asif to take a five-wicket haul in his first two ODIs. Bilal also did it in his second match, in 2015.All downhill after winning the tossSri Lanka, trailing 4-0, chose to bat first after they called right at the toss. That turned out to be the only good thing to happen to them all day. They lost two wickets in their first over, two in their third and were four down with only eight runs on the board. Only once have they lost their fourth wicket at a lower score. Three of their top five batsmen were out for ducks – Sadeera Samarawickrama, Dinesh Chandimal and Niroshan Dickwella, and this was only their third such instance in ODIs.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe visitors couldn’t really recover from that nightmarish start and were eventually all out for 103, in 26.2 overs. It was their shortest innings, and second-lowest score, after choosing to bat first. It was also the fewest overs Pakistan have taken to dismiss their opposition after losing the toss and having to bowl first.Sri Lanka’s innings was the ninth-shortest for any team after electing to bat first.Third 5-0 whitewash in 2017, 12th successive defeat
Sri Lanka’s wretched year in ODIs has turned worse with every match of this series. They have suffered their third whitewash in five bilateral series this year – against South Africa, India and Pakistan. Before this, no team had ever been whitewashed more than twice in a year in bilateral series of five or more games. Incidentally, from 1982 to 2016, they had been whitewashed only once in a five-match series, by India in 2014.Sri Lanka have a 4-21 win-loss record in ODIs this year, one of the worst years for any team. This tour of the UAE has been a rare case of one team sweeping the Test series and the other sweeping the ODI series. England’s 2011-12 tour of the UAE was similar – they lost the Tests 3-0 and won the ODIs 4-0.Sri Lanka are now on a streak of 12 consecutive losses and are only two short of their longest losing run. They had lost 14 in a row between 1987 and 1988. Incidentally, none of the eight oldest full-member teams have suffered more than 11 losses in a row. England and West Indies have lost 11 in a row.

Most consecutive defeats in ODIs, by eight oldest full-member teams

Matches Team From To14 Sri Lanka Jan 1987 Jan 198812* Sri Lanka Jul 2017 Oct 201711 England Oct 2000 Jun 200111 West Indies Feb 2005 Aug 2005Pakistan extended their winning streak to nine games and are three short of their longest victory streak of 12 games between 2007 and 2008. This was the sixth time Pakistan had swept a five-match series, the joint-most instances along with India. Pakistan have whitewashed Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and New Zealand in the past and they last did so in 2008, against Bangladesh. Dream year for Pakistan’s quicksPakistan’s fast bowlers have been sensational in 2017. Statistically, this year has been the best ever for Pakistan’s fast bowlers in terms of strike rate. They have picked up a wicket once every 28.6 balls, which is their best in any year. Overall this strike rate is the third-best for any team that has played 10 or more ODIs in a year. South Africa’s quicks struck once every 27.2 balls in 2011, and Australia’s once every 27.6 balls in 2015. Pakistan’s previous best year in this case was 2008, when their fast bowlers had a strike rate of 29.

Best bowling strike rate by fast bowlers for teams in a year (Min. 10 ODIs)

Team Year Mats Wkts Ave SRSouth Africa 2011 15 78 20.23 27.20Australia 2015 19 136 23.28 27.60Pakistan 2017 18 98 25.61 28.60Pakistan 2008 21 110 24.37 29.00Australia 2010 25 167 23.42 29.50Except Wahab Riaz, none of the six other Pakistan fast bowlers have averaged more than 32 this year. Hasan Ali has been the standout with 45 wickets at an average of just 17.04.Pakistan have no more ODIs scheduled for this year. They will now look back fondly on a memorable year in ODIs, which has brought them a Champions Trophy victory and a whitewash of Sri Lanka, and seen the rise of talents such as Hasan, Shadab Khan, Fakhar Zaman, Faheem Ashraf, Usman Khan and Imam-ul-Haq.

Rohit Sharma equals Colin Munro, and MS Dhoni's day of plenty

Hardik Pandya, meanwhile, became the first Indian player to score 30 and take four wickets in a T20I match

Bharath Seervi08-Jul-2018India have registered their sixth successive T20I series win with their 2-1 victory over England. The streak began last year with a 2-1 win over New Zealand, since when they have beaten Sri Lanka and South Africa, won the tri-nation Nidahas Trophy, and beaten Ireland and England on this tour. This was also their ninth successive three-match bilateral T20I series without a defeat. Since 2016, they have won eight series and one was drawn.

India in three-match T20I series since 2016
Opposition Margin Result Home/Away Year
Australia 3-0 Won Away 2016
Sri Lanka 2-1 Won Home 2016
Zimbabwe 2-1 Won Away 2016
England 2-1 Won Home 2017
Australia 1-1* Draw Home 2017
New Zealand 2-1 Won Home 2017
Sri Lanka 3-0 Won Home 2017
South Africa 2-1 Won Away 2018
England 2-1 Won Away 2018

*third game of the series was washed out due to rainRohit Sharma’s third ton
Rohit Sharma became only the second player to score three T20I hundreds. Colin Munro was the first to do so, getting there last year. Rohit scored his maiden T20I century against South Africa at Dharamsala in 2015 and his second against Sri Lanka in Indore last year. Rohit’s 100* off 56 balls was his fifth century in all T20s, which is the most among Indian players and Asian players.Hardik Pandya’s all-round show
Hardik Pandya picked up his maiden four-wicket haul in T20s in the first innings and then scored an unbeaten 33 off 14 balls to finish off India’s chase. He became the first India player and eighth overall to score 30 and take four wickets in a T20I match. The last such all-round performance by any player was in 2015, when Dwayne Bravo scored 31 and picked up 4 for 28 against Sri Lanka.ESPNcricinfo LtdMS Dhoni’s unique record
Dhoni became the first ever player to take five catches in a T20I innings. He was involved in six of the nine dismissals in England’s innings including a run-out. Mohammad Shahzad is the only other player to effect five dismissals in a T20I. He took three catches and effected two stumpings against Oman in 2015.

Peter Siddle eager to fill Australia's leadership gap

Apart from the form he brings from the County Championship, the fast bowler also adds vast experience of Asian conditions to a squad lacking Steven Smith, David Warner, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins

Daniel Brettig25-Sep-20180:54

Australia focussed on Pakistan’s spinners – Siddle

There are a few reasons why Peter Siddle is in Dubai sweating it out with the Australian Test squad, rather than donning a beanie in the last throes of the English County Championship, or firing down a white ball for Victoria in the domestic limited-overs tournament back home. One is his recent performance for Essex, a reminder of Siddle’s quality, and another is his vast experience in Asian conditions, dating back to the 2008 tour of India alongside the likes of Ricky Ponting and Matthew Hayden.Most overwhelming in the factors for Siddle’s recall, however, is that the team now captained by Tim Paine and coached by Justin Langer was desperate for senior figures. Not only to replace the missing Steven Smith, David Warner, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins, but also to help chart a new and better cultural and performance path for the Australian team in their first series since the Newlands ball-tampering scandal.In recent years it could be argued that Siddle’s skills were rather undervalued by Australia, whether it was in his omission from the 2015 Ashes until the final Test, or his being rushed back from injury into the team in late 2016, whereupon he re-injured his back. Now, in the team’s hour of need, Siddle is back in favour, and he has a clear idea of why this is so.”JL’s spoken a lot about good people and good characters and coming into the side I think, just from an outside point of view, the side probably in the last little bit maybe lacked a bit of leadership,” Siddle said in Dubai. “So I think without having the captain or vice-captain or any of those terms, it’s just about being a leader in my own right, just doing what I do to lead by example and just help out the young guys and help out the group … it’s stuff I’d normally do.”But you want to make sure you get the right things done and the team’s preparing well. All in all the whole group is preparing as leaders, they’re going out there and leading by example in their own right. That’s a good sign for this group going forward and just looking forward to a few more training sessions, but I think everyone’s starting to adapt well to the conditions and looking forward to this practice match.”Having been coached by each of Tim Nielsen, Mickey Arthur and Darren Lehmann before Langer’s arrival, Siddle said the difference in styles was noticeable. The word most often used to describe Langer was again used when Siddle pondered the approach of Langer to a job he had first applied for as far back as 2011 – intensity.”He’s very intense. I think people could understand the way he went about the game when he played, how switched on and how hard he worked,” Siddle said. “I think we probably get a good understanding that’s how he’s coaching regime’s going to be. It started off like that, which is enjoyable. He knows his plans, knows the way he wants the team to go and I think the boys are getting a good feel for that over these first couple of days.”I’ve had a few coaches over my time in the role as a player, but it’s always fresh when a new coach, a new person comes in, their personality and they way they want to coach and lead the team. It always gives a good vibe around the group and with the younger guys here also it’s been enjoyable.”One area in which this adaptation is being attempted in a more rigorous fashion than before is in the calling up of a pair of Indian spin bowlers through the network of the spin consultant Sridharan Sriram – the legspinner Pardeep Sahu and the left-arm wristspinner KK Jiyas. This pair have been hired as part of an effort to simulate the offerings of Yasir Shah, who so confounded the Australians in the UAE in 2014, and Shadab Khan. Siddle noted this was a step up in preparation from what he had experienced on past tours.”I think in the past we’ve come into series, worked hard on spin but not specifically on what they’re bowling, the deliveries they bowl and the cues to watch as a batter,” Siddle said. “We’ve been lucky enough to get a couple of guys come in that are very good spin bowlers. I think the big focus is they’ve got two star legspinners, Yasir Shah who we’ve played before, a great player, and Shadab Khan, who’s been playing and we expect to line up.”So we’ve got a contest against those two guys, and having good discussions about different deliveries, what to watch, I think it’s been good for us tailenders as well to hear from different batters, the way they go about it, the way they watch the ball. It’s nice to hear from them and it gives us something to work on when we get in the nets. I definitely think it’s helped me personally and the other guys have definitely learned a lot from it.”Getty ImagesPakistan have struggled for traction in the concurrent Asia Cup being played in Dubai, but Siddle noted that the extra volume of cricket being played in the stadium will likely have a flow-on effect for the sort of pitch prepared for the Test match starting on October 7. Namely, it will be likely to take spin earlier in the game than its 2014 equivalent.”The Dubai wicket has had a lot of cricket played on it throughout this Asia Cup, so you can see the whole square’s being used a lot more,” Siddle said. “So I think the previous series when we came here, the wicket was a bit flatter, a bit more slate, so it took a few days to actually break up, but this series it looks like it’s going to break up a lot earlier so spin is going to play a part.”I think for me it’s going to be similar to what I do in Australia, it’s about holding up an end, building pressure and trying to put the batsmen under a lot of pressure to generate those wickets. I don’t think my plan changes a hell of a lot from different conditions. But probably more so here it’s about hitting the stumps, making them play a lot more and having the fielders in the right positions.”As for whether Siddle’s presence and experience will be useful in ensuring the Australian team does not let behavioural and cultural issues get out of hand in the UAE, despite the hot sun and unrelenting conditions, the 33-year-old is hopeful that the lessons of past tours will come in handy. “It’s hard to say,” he said. “Emotions come out in games and different things happen throughout matches, which you react to.”Hopefully just being around the group and just giving a bit of knowledge about conditions. I’ve played in the subcontinent a lot, I’ve played here once before, and it’s just about talking about those experiences. I got to play under some great guys on my first ever Test tour [in India in 2008], Haydos and Punter and Brett Lee, guys like that who’ve played a lot of cricket.”I’ve taken a lot of knowledge from them and hopefully I can pass a bit of that to these guys and watch them go forward. I think these days the boys have played a lot in the subcontinent, even the younger guys, so they’ve been exposed to those conditions, which is exciting. They’re not coming in here in an unknown world not knowing anything, so the young guys are preparing very well in the nets at the moment.”

'We're governed by things we can't control' – Hong Kong coach Simon Cook

Simon Cook, the Hong Kong coach, chats with ESPNcricinfo about the challenges of motivating a team that has lost its ODI status, and of retaining talent in a system without too much money

Shashank Kishore in Dubai17-Sep-2018How tough is it to motivate a group without ODI status? How do you deal with it?It’s tough. We try and isolate the players from political talk. There are always questions on issues like ODI status. ‘Is it fair’ or ‘is it not fair?’ We can sit here and debate that for hours together. We’re of the opinion that two-and-a-half years of the World Cricket League should be rewarded in a better way than having a bad week [at the World Cup qualifiers] in Zimbabwe. It happened to the Netherlands four years ago, so the same situation can be used as a catalyst, but the fact is we’ve lost four years. There’s a lot of talk at the moment about ways of assigning ODI status to top Associates: whether you assign it on a tournament-to-tournament basis or go through the ranking system, I’m not sure. I will be attending an ICC meeting in Madrid about the WCL. Whether we talk ODI status, I’m not sure, but the fact is we’re at the receiving end of a poor week in Zimbabwe.What did it take to lift the team from that slump?It didn’t take a lot. We know we had a bad week. You don’t become a bad player overnight. It’s about making sure the players still believe in themselves. Unfortunately it happened at the wrong time. We had honest chats about how we can improve and they responded brilliantly at the Asia Cup Qualifiers. After losing to Malaysia in the first game, it could’ve slid down, but they showed character to win the next six games in a row.What are the challenges for a Hong Kong cricketer currently? It’s largely an amateur sport. Even now, you play one week and then have three weeks off. In Premier Division cricket, you play 10 games in nine months. You can’t build momentum like that. We’ve got three grounds and so many teams, so you have to rotate fixtures. There are five premier clubs and the league is structured in different parts of the year, depending on the availability of the national team. They play in a T20 League, 50-over league and only two two-day matches. You can’t get a constant run of form by playing so little. As a player, you get a hundred, and then wonder what next for three weeks? Coming from an English system, where you play every Saturday-Sunday, train two days, then play two more games, this is different, but you have to live with it and be realistic.What have you done to drive more cricketers to the game?We’ve now brought in full-time contracts for 13 cricketers, strength and conditioning coaches and physios. Players are trained to work on other aspects of their games like lifestyle and wellness. The guys get cooking lessons, so that they can eat properly and manage their weights. The good thing is the average age of the current national team is in the mid-20s. Gradually we’re getting to a stage where we’re starting to move forward. These systems are also trickling down to the Under-16s and Under-19s. But it’s a gradual process.

“We can’t retain players who want to go to university for banking or law; they’re full-time careers. We can’t stop them, we shouldn’t stop them.”

There must be hindrances too?Of course. We lose players at 23-24. In a normal county system, that’s the peak age for a young cricketer, and you look at possibly having him in the mix for 10-12 years. That’s not the case here. Chris Carter for example is going to flight school probably after the Asia Cup, Jamie Atkinson, our previous captain, wanted to become a full-time teacher. He’s still available, but can’t commit all the time. Mark Chapman went to New Zealand at 20, and needs to have a three-year cooling-off period if he wants to return, but he played a lot of early cricket here. So we lose all our players at 23-24, so we have to make sure we invest a lot in the Under-16s and Under-19s. We’re slowly having a core group who will probably play international cricket at a young age, so we need to ensure we maximise their time with us before they go off to university.What can you do to prevent losing players?It all comes down to money. We’re governed by things we can’t control. Hong Kong is among the most expensive places to live and work in the world. Our player contracts are not enough for them to realistically live and work, have a family and make a career by just playing cricket. We know we can’t pay as much, but if we can provide a professional set-up to potentially play in CPL, Canada T20, PSL or BPL to earn franchise contracts, that’s great. It could also give us some spin-off benefits when it comes to their development. So we support them to find avenues to play elsewhere. It is a constant challenge.So if a player wants to study and yet play cricket, which may not allow him to commit 100% all the time, what do you do?We can’t retain players who want to go to university for banking or law; they’re full-time careers. We can’t stop them, we shouldn’t stop them. It’s just a case of giving them an opportunity at another career. Some delay going off, some don’t. I’m very big on players getting an education degree that allows them to buy opportunities to have a crack at cricket, without worrying about being picked or having an annual retainer. Once you have something to fall back on, you can play with freedom. We try and stress upon this for a lot of them from the 16-19 age-group.How does selection work in Hong Kong, with so many players also having alternate careers?We contract 13 players, but that doesn’t guarantee national selection. Selection-wise, it’s tough because we can’t go always by the numbers because of huge gaps between matches. We’re also constrained by dimensions of the ground. Suddenly you will see guys getting a lot of runs, and then when they transition into grounds that have 75m boundaries, they struggle, because they’d use the same options that got them runs in smaller grounds. We have a group of three selectors. Apart from them, we talk to coaches and umpires to get feedback. You try and look at how players play, are they playing in a way that will give them success. We also look at players sometimes who don’t get runs. That might be because they’re not willing to take risks, like to work the ball around, pick gaps and not look to hit a 45-metre six. Sometimes such players may be better suited to make the transition to international cricket. So we have to be careful to find a mix.How do you scout for talent?The one thing we have an advantage over any other country in the world is, we know every single player intimately in our system. We don’t have that many, but our five main clubs produce 90% of our players. We know all the players and coaches, so from that aspect it is pretty easy. No ground is farther than 20 minutes, you can watch every single game across the three main grounds on one day. You can’t do that in most countries. That is an advantage when it comes to talent identification, but it’s the other aspects like retaining them that is a challenge.

Bhuvneshwar and Rayudu in focus ahead of Asia Cup squad selection

With Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni likely to return, the selectors have room to experiment without hurting the team’s chances of victory

Ankur Dhawan31-Aug-2018Like the premiere of an obscure film, highlighted by the ones that are not in attendance rather than the ones who are, the announcement of India’s squad for the Asia Cup might be headlined by those who are rested rather than those who are picked. That isn’t to undermine the importance of the tournament, but simply a corollary of a physically and mentally demanding, two-month tour of England that’s still a Test-and-a-half away from completion.It does, however, present India with one of four opportunities, leading up to the 2019 World Cup, to zero in on a middle-order batsman who can, ideally, also roll his arm over and delve deeper into a seemingly bottomless pace-bowling pool. With bilateral series against West Indies, Australia and New Zealand also coming up, India can afford to get funky with their selections now, without necessarily jeopardising their chances of winning the Asia Cup, especially considering that the experienced Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni are likely to return refreshed.Rohit to lead?India’s captain and all-format match-winner Virat Kohli had said that missing his Surrey county stint due to injury was a blessing in disguise, and his scores on the England tour have certainly corroborated that. While runs have flowed from his bat like a river, his team-mates have been largely parched for them, meaning that he has had to shoulder enormous responsibility. The effects of that, or a grueling schedule – it’s irrelevant which one – had begun to show at Lord’s, where Kohli was briefly hampered by a bad back. While his withdrawal might be commercially problematic for the tournament, there is a strong case for him to take a break, leaving his deputy Rohit to lead the team, as in the Nidhas Trophy, which India won.Bhuvneshwar to return?The BCCI had acknowledged the need to manage the workload of their premier fast bowlers after Bhuvneshwar Kumar was ruled out of the Test series in England (the first three Tests at the time).Jasprit Bumrah also had to deal with some injury worries, missing the limited-overs leg of the tour after hurting his thumb while attempting a return catch. He returned with a match-winning five-for at Trent Bridge, which only reinforced his importance in this team.After weeks of intense rehabilitation, Bhuvneshwar, too, returned to action with an impressive performance against South Africa A, picking up 3 for 33 in nine overs and showing no discernible discomfort while bowling or fielding.India could think of roping Bhuvneshwar back in and leaving Bumrah out, as a balancing act.Ambati Rayudu plays one on the leg side•PTI What about Jadhav and Rayudu?With Suresh Raina’s umpteenth foray into the ODI side in England reaping frugal returns, a fit-again Kedar Jadhav should walk back into the squad. He was put out of action by a hamstring injury sustained at the start of the IPL, and though it was not until this past week that he recovered enough to play a competitive match, a batting average that touches 40 and an uncanny bowling action will be hard for India to ignore.Meanwhile, Ambati Rayudu, who came off an IPL high only to suffer the yo-yo low, now looks set to restart his India career. The 32-year-old has officially passed his fitness test and, last Thursday, proved his value with a Man-of-the-Match performance against Australia A. He could be a viable option in the top order should the selectors think of resting KL Rahul.Pant, or Karthik, or both?Dinesh Karthik went to England in the form of his life, but like a broken umbrella during torrential rain, it betrayed him when it mattered most. The ODI decider in Headingley, where he chopped on for 21, was followed by four dismal Test innings, two of which ended in ducks. Rishabh Pant replaced him in Nottingham and has shown flashes of brilliance with the bat already – not least through the audacious six to get off the mark – and safe glovework against the Dukes ball. He could well take over as India’s back-up wicketkeeper in ODIs. That doesn’t mean it’s the end of the road for Karthik. With the Asia Cup taking place in conditions where the ball doesn’t seam or swing too much, he could yet add value as a lower-order hitter.Can Kaul keep his place?A death-overs specialist for Surisers Hyderabad, Siddarth Kaul wasn’t nearly as penetrative or economical for India in the England ODIs and, given the surge in the country’s fast bowling stocks, he could find it difficult to keep his place. Mohammed Siraj, with 29 wickets in his last four first-class matches and a four-wicket burst against Australia A in one-day cricket, could get a look-in at Kaul’s expense.

Who's got Virat Kohli out the most times?

Also: was West Indies’ total of 45 the lowest in any T20I?

Steven Lynch12-Mar-2019Adam Zampa has now got Virat Kohli out five times. Which other bowlers can claim to have Virat’s number? asked Pranav from India
The Australian legspinner Adam Zampa has indeed now dismissed Virat Kohli on five occasions in internationals – three times in ODIs, and twice in T20Is. There are actually 12 men who have got him out more often, admittedly usually from more attempts. Leading the way, with eight, are the England pair of James Anderson (five in Tests, three in ODIs) and Graeme Swann (four in each). Next, with seven, come Nathan Lyon (all in Tests, the most for anyone), Morne Morkel (four in Tests and three in ODIs), Ravi Rampaul (six times in ODIs – the most – and once in Tests) and Tim Southee (five in ODIs, two in Tests).Five Englishmen – Moeen Ali, Stuart Broad, Adil Rashid, Ben Stokes and Chris Woakes – and one Australian (Pat Cummins) have dismissed Kohli on six occasions in internationals. Thisara Perera of Sri Lanka has, like Zampa, nabbed him five times.Was West Indies’ total of 45 the lowest in any T20I? asked Mark Hartford from England
West Indies’ headlong collapse to 45 all out in Basseterre last week was the lowest in T20Is by a Test-playing nation. The previous lowest was 60, set by New Zealand against Sri Lanka in the World T20 in Chittagong in March 2014, and equalled by West Indies against Pakistan in Karachi in April 2018.There has been one lower total by a non-Test nation: Netherlands were shot out for 39 by Sri Lanka in March 2014, also in Chittagong during the World T20.There have been several lower totals in women’s T20 internationals, which since last July have included all matches between ICC member countries. The record at the moment is 14, by China against United Arab Emirates in Bangkok in January.Who has scored the most runs in one-day internationals without ever making a hundred? asked Keith Matthews from England
There’s a clear leader here: Misbah-ul-Haq scored 5122 runs in 162 ODIs for Pakistan, with no fewer than 42 half-centuries – but his highest score was 96 not out, against West Indies at The Oval in the Champions Trophy in June 2013. Misbah’s highest five scores in ODIs – 96, 93 and a trio of 83s – were all not-outs.Two more Pakistanis are next on the list. Wasim Akram scored 3717 runs in 356 ODIs, with a highest score of 86, while Moin Khan made 3266 in 219 matches, with a highest of 72 not out.The record in Tests is held by Shane Warne, who scored 3154 runs with a highest score of 99, while the most in T20Is as I write is shared: both Virat Kohli (highest score 90 not out) and Shoaib Malik (75) have scored 2263 runs.Misbah ul-Haq has ten hundreds in Tests, but not one in ODIs – the closest he’s come is 96 not out against West Indies in 2013•Getty ImagesI hope he’ll play another one, but at the moment Will Somerville has played one Test for New Zealand, and won it. I think this is rare for New Zealand, who don’t win often! Has anyone else done this? asked Michael Woods… from New Zealand
Offspinner Will Somerville made his Test debut for New Zealand against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi in December 2018, not long after returning to his native land from Australia, where he had played for New South Wales. Somerville hasn’t yet played another Test, although it’s a bit soon to write him off.You’re right in thinking that a 100% success record is unusual for a New Zealander. At the moment there are 31 Kiwi one-cap wonders, and only two of the others (apart from Somerville) were on the winning side in the only Test they played: fast bowlers Andre Adams, against England in Auckland in 2001-02, and Gary Robertson, against Australia in Auckland in 1985-86.You talked last week about people who had been out second ball for six. But has anyone ever been out second ball for five? asked Chris Evans from the Netherlands
My first thought was that there wouldn’t be any – but that’s always dangerous! Actually, as this table shows, there are nine known instances in men’s international cricket – six in ODIs and three in T20s. The first eight all involved a run-out – usually a case of a four followed by the player being caught short going for a second run next ball – but the most recent case was more interesting. Playing for Pakistan against New Zealand in Dubai in a one-day international in November 2018, Faheem Ashraf got off the mark first ball with a five (thanks to some overthrows), and then was out to the next delivery he faced.Use our feedback form or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Stump mics have their uses but beware the manipulation

Before hailing stump mics as the cure to a persistent but minor irritant, cricket must pause to consider the side effects

Sambit Bal18-Feb-2019It’s hardly cricket’s gallery of shame – for there’s match-fixing and various forms of cheating and instances of graver misconduct – but in the first two months of this year, cricketers have brought varying levels of embarrassment on themselves and the game through the words they have spoken on and off the field.It has led to bans and suspensions and, crucially and somewhat alarmingly, exposed several levels of prejudices – sexism and misogyny in the case of Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul, racial profiling in the case of Sarfaraz Ahmed, and oblique homophobia in the case of Shannon Gabriel – among elite cricketers. On a wider level, it’s a reflection of the gap between expected behaviour and prevalent behaviour.The boundaries of acceptable behaviour and conduct have been redrawn in this more global, connected, but decidedly elite world the cricketers now inhabit. But it is one they are ill-prepared for on account of a combination of factors – background, lack of opportunities to develop societal skills, and the insularity that celebrity brings.Given where and to whom it was addressed, it was staggering that Sarfaraz was unable to grasp the terrible nature of his lapse – even assuming that it was a general venting of frustration, and he hadn’t intended for Andile Phehlukwayo to understand the meaning of .Just as in the case of Pandya – and to a lesser extent, Rahul – who couldn’t have excused his performance on the grounds that it was an extension of boy banter in a casual setting, it would have been no defence for the captain of Pakistan that the term isn’t as pejorative in the subcontinent where the abhorrent practice of coining nicknames from skin colours or other physical attributes isn’t uncommon, and those at the receiving end are resigned to it.

“The keys at the moment are in the hands of the home broadcasters and, in many cases, the live feed is produced by the home board. As it stands, it’s open to manipulation, or at the very least to accusations and perceptions of manipulation.”

It was right for the players to cop the punishment, but the question remains whether the accountability shouldn’t extend to their employers.As society evolves, lines are constantly redrawn. With a contemporary lens, a lot of on-field banter now part of cricket folklore becomes, at the very least, cringe-worthy. Consider this exchange – perhaps apocryphal – between Ian Botham and Rodney Marsh, among cricket’s most celebrated sledges.But who’s going to drum this in to the players, who come from different backgrounds and cultures, and don’t receive the same education or sensitisation, but who must always be judged by a uniform code of behaviour?Cricket treats itself as a corporate entity on most counts and, apart from being heroes and celebrities, cricketers are highly remunerated employees of cricket boards and franchises. Enormous resources are spent – rightfully so – on developing their primary skills, but since they are also the game’s primary ambassadors judged for their conduct both on and off the field, should they not be adequately prepared? Franchise cricket has done its bit in exposing players to different cultures, but how much institutional training do the cricketers receive?Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul were banned for their controversial comments in a TV programme•Getty ImagesTwo of these three instances were brought to light because the stump mics were turned on, and given the nature of the transgressions, it’s difficult to feel sympathy for the players in question. But however tempting it might be to draw obvious conclusions, we must assess these two issues – on-field verbal transgressions and broadcasting of the chatter – separately.The ICC is now an enthusiastic advocate of the idea of keeping the mics on, which has received the unqualified support of Moeen Ali, who claimed in his recent autobiography to have been at the receiving end of a racial taunt that was not caught by mics.It is a persuasive argument. Switched-on stump mics have the potential to cut down personal abuse and bring greater accountability from players. The game needs its tensions and emotions, but once players are aware of repercussions, they are likely to stay within the line.And it can make the game both more accessible and entertaining for fans. MS Dhoni behind the stumps to spinners provides the perfect mix of insight, wisdom and hilarity for the television viewer who can now feel part of the plot. And for a sport in constant pursuit of finding new ways to engage the fans, this is an attractive option.

‘However tempting it might be to draw obvious conclusions, we must assess these two issues – on-field verbal transgressions and broadcasting of the chatter – separately.’

However, cricket must be wary of the potential dangers. To start with, it would only be natural, as FICA articulated, if players were concerned about the inconsistency of its application.The keys at the moment are in the hands of the home broadcasters and, in many cases, the live feed is produced by the home board. As it stands, it’s open to manipulation, or at the very least to accusations and perceptions of manipulation.During their last tour of India, the Australian cricket team complained about the selective airing of an exchange between Mathew Wade and Ravindra Jadeja. The reverse happened in Australia when the home broadcasters clipped out a mild spat between Jadeja and team-mate Ishant Sharma during a drinks break. The Indian team management felt it was mischievous.More interesting was the practice of making the stump mic the primary feed during certain overs. It produced some entertaining exchanges between Rishabh Pant and Tim Paine, which culminated in that photo Paine’s wife posted on Instagram going viral. But the fact remained it was the broadcasters who chose the overs, and a feeling persisted in the Indian camp that Pant, a young player on his first tour to Australia, might have been set up as easy prey.Just as in the cases of ball tampering, which are now invariably unearthed by the broadcasters and almost always expose the touring players, the selective use of stump mics has the potential of attracting accusations of bias.And finally, stump mics have limited surveillance value. They cover only a fraction of the ground, and as demonstrated in the case of Joe Root and Gabriel, the recording can sometimes be partial – it was that which prompted Gabriel to release his part of the conversation. ​Most of these incidents, of course, occur in the vicinity of the stump mics, the stumps being the focus of cricket’s central confrontation. But that doesn’t mean no infractions take place in other parts of the field, and those these mics can’t capture.Those who abuse as a tactic will simply get smarter about it. Already, there are examples of players muttering under their breath, or with their hands covering their mouths. Finding a way around the stump mic is unlikely to be an insurmountable challenge. It could also encourage entrapment of gullible cricketers – not everyone has the wit or the felicity of language to respond in kind to provocations – by those more adept at the art of sledging.Before hailing stump mics as the cure to a persistent but minor irritant, cricket must pause to consider these side effects.

Who scored the first century in a World Cup match?

The answer is not as straightforward as it seems

Steven Lynch21-May-2019Dom Sibley has now scored a century in six consecutive first-class matches. Where does that stand in the records – for first-class cricket and for the County Championship? asked Sandy Whitlock from England
Dominic Sibley’s unbeaten 109 last week, while carrying his bat for Warwickshire against Hampshire at Edgbaston, put him on a select list of players who had scored centuries in six successive first-class matches: it had previously been done by Sid Barnes, David Boon, Don Bradman, Denis Compton, Nari Contractor, CB Fry, Jacques Kallis, Brian Lara, Mike Procter and Bob Simpson. Bradman had a separate run of seven matches with a hundred, which equalled the feat of Lancashire’s Ernest Tyldesley in 1926.But this is one of the few such lists on which Bradman does not come out on top. His fellow Australian, Bill Ponsford, had an incredible run of ten matches over two seasons in which he scored at least a hundred. His sequence, which included a quadruple-century, two triples and two doubles, deserves looking at in full: in 1926-27, he made 214 and 54 for Victoria against South Australia, 151 v Queensland, 352 of Victoria’s record first-class total of 1107 against New South Wales, 108 and 64 v South Australia, and 12 and 116 v Queensland, before ending the season with 131 and 7 for an Australian XI against the Rest. Ponsford then started the 1927-28 summer with 133 for Victoria against South Australia, 437 v Queensland, 202 and 38 v NSW, and 336 v South Australia. The run was emphatically ended by two single-figure dismissals in the return match with NSW.Bradman does hold the record for Tests. He reached 100 in six successive matches, all against England, in 1936-37 and 1938: Jacques Kallis, Mohammad Yousuf and Gautam Gambhir come next with five. Actually Bradman scored hundreds in eight successive Tests between 1936-37 and 1946-47 in which he batted, but he was injured at The Oval in 1938 and couldn’t go in.Sibley’s current run is ongoing, which means he may yet move up the list. Five of his centuries have come in successive Championship matches, equalling the Warwickshire record set by Brian Lara in 1994. The BBC statistician Andrew Samson kindly informs me that there have been 14 other instances of five (two of them by Graham Gooch), while Tyldesley (in 1926) and Walter Hammond (1938) managed six, and Len Hutton seven in 1947. But Denis Compton set the record, earlier in that run-soaked 1947 summer, with eight centuries in successive County Championship matches.Who scored the first century in a World Cup match? asked Michael Stevens from England
This one is not quite as simple as it might sound. The first World Cup, in 1975, kicked off with four matches on the same day – June 7 – all starting at 11am. Dennis Amiss scored 137 for England against India at Lord’s in one of the opening matches, while Glenn Turner pounded an unbeaten 171 for New Zealand against East Africa at Edgbaston in another.They still stopped for lunch in ODIs in those days, and when the players went off at 1pm Amiss had 98 (after 35 overs of the eventual 60) and Turner 82 (after 40). We don’t have precise ball-by-ball data, but it’s safe to say that Amiss got to three figures first – just. He reached 100 in the 37th over, and was out in the 51st.Shakib Al Hasan has a five-for and a century set in Tests and ODIs, and all he needs to complete the trinity is a T20I hundred•AFPHas any cricketer taken five wickets and made a century in all three formats of international cricket? asked Krishna Saha from Bangladesh
No one has yet managed a full set in all three formats – but two players have managed five out of six. Chris Gayle has hundreds in Tests, ODIs and T20Is, plus five-fors in Tests and ODIs – but his best bowling in T20Is is 2 for 15. More likely to complete the nap hand is Shakib Al Hasan of Bangladesh, who already has five-fors in all three and just lacks a T20I hundred – his highest score so far is 84, against Pakistan in Pallekele during the World T20 in September 2012.No women have completed a full set either. Deandra Dottin of West Indies has hundreds and five-fors in both ODIs and T20Is, but hasn’t yet played a Test.How many players have finished on the losing side after scoring more than 150 in an ODI, as Imam-ul-Haq did last week? asked Mauro Freitas from Kuwait
Rather surprisingly, perhaps, Imam-ul-Haq’s fine performance in Bristol the other day was the 17th occasion that a batsman had reached 150 in a one-day international innings but ended up on the losing side. The highest of all remains 194 not out, by the Zimbabwean Charles Coventry, against Bangladesh in Bulawayo in 2009.Imam’s score was the highest in a losing cause for Pakistan, which was previously 140, by Saeed Anwar against India in Dhaka in 1997-98.I read somewhere that India has the highest number of centuries in men’s ODIs. Which teams hold the record in Tests and T20Is? asked Kunal Roy from India
It’s true that Indian batsmen have scored the most individual centuries in one-day internationals: 280, going into the World Cup. That’s comfortably ahead of Australia (221, from a record 47 different batsmen) and Pakistan (200). Next come South Africa (179), West Indies (178), England and Sri Lanka (171), New Zealand (130), Zimbabwe (63), Bangladesh (50) and Ireland (35).England lead the way in Tests with 865 centuries (by 167 different players), not far ahead of Australia (848). But England have played more matches – 1010 to Australia’s 820 – so the Aussies are ahead on average; they are the only country to average more than a century a Test. Next come India (506 centuries from 533 Tests), West Indies (487 from 542), Pakistan (388 from 423), South Africa (379 from 432), New Zealand (293 from 433), Sri Lanka (263 from 283), Zimbabwe (59 from 107) and Bangladesh (57 from 114).In T20Is, India and New Zealand have seven individual hundreds, and Australia six. In all men’s internationals, Australia have had 1075 centuries, England 1037, and India 793.Australia also lead the way in women’s ODIs, with 52 hundreds to England’s 51; New Zealand are next with 42. In women’s Tests, it’s England 41, Australia 32 (then India 12 and New Zealand 11), while England shade Australia and West Indies 3-2 in women’s T20Is.Use our feedback form or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Game
Register
Service
Bonus